Im not sure, all i know is that im a transvestite.
A=r mod z R= a relation which is reflexive symmetric but not transitive
A partial dependency is a dependency where A is functionally dependant on B ( A → B), but there is some attribute on A that can be removed from A and yet the dependacy stills holds. For instance if the relation existed StaffNo, sName → branchNo Then you could say that for every StaffNo, sName there is only one value of branchNo, but since there is no relation between branchNo and staffNo the relation is only partial. In a transitive dependancy is where A → B and B → C, therefore A → C (provided that B → A, and C → A doesn't exist). In the relation staffNo → sName, position, salary, branchNo, bAddress branchNo → bAddress is a transitive dependacy because it exists on StaffNo via BranchNo. That is the difference. A partial dependency is a dependency where A is functionally dependant on B ( A → B), but there is some attribute on A that can be removed from A and yet the dependacy stills holds. For instance if the relation existed StaffNo, sName → branchNo Then you could say that for every StaffNo, sName there is only one value of branchNo, but since there is no relation between branchNo and staffNo the relation is only partial. In a transitive dependancy is where A → B and B → C, therefore A → C (provided that B → A, and C → A doesn't exist). In the relation staffNo → sName, position, salary, branchNo, bAddress branchNo → bAddress is a transitive dependacy because it exists on StaffNo via BranchNo. That is the difference.
Transitive Property (mathematics), property of a mathematical relation such that if the relation holds between a and b and between b and c, then it also exists between a and c. The equality relation, for example, is transitive because if a = b and b = c, then a = c. Other transitive relations include greater than (>), less than (<), greater than or equal to (?), and less than or equal to (?).
Transitivity can be applied to relations between objects or sets - not to the sets themselves. For example, the relation "less-than" for real numbers, or the relation "is a subset of" for subsets, are both transitive. So is equality.
No. Do your own homework. http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cache:ZZmsH0jKHH8J:www.cs.utk.edu/~horton/hw1.pdf+For+each+part+give+a+relation+that+satisfies+the+condition+a+Reflexive+and+symmetric+but+not+transitive+b+Reflexive+and+transitive+but+not+symmetric+c+Symmetric+and+transitive+but+not+reflexive%3F&hl=en&gl=us&sig=AFQjCNHGyc1EDhfqj_mu-RV9yTYZZfXl6A
Close is a transitive verb because the word, "close" needs and object to identify the verb.
A transitive relation is which objects of a similar nature are the same. An example is if a and b are the same, and if b and c are the same; then a and c are the same.
vbvb
An relation is equivalent if and only if it is symmetric, reflexive and transitive. That is, if a ~ b and b ~a, if a ~ a, and if a ~ b, and b ~ c, then a ~ c.
predicate = crashed his car (= what comes after the subject) verb (crashed) is transitive (it takes an object) this is not the right answers
Rate This AnswerThe transitive property states that if a relation holds between a and b and between b and c, then it also exists between a and c.So, if A=B AND B=C, THEN A=C
No. It is not transitive. x ≠y and y ≠z does not imply that x ≠z