It wasn't! Herbert Spencer took a Lamarkian view of natural evolutionary process and tried to anneal this to social processes. Not very successfully from a scientific viewpoint, though it seem sociologists seem to think this excuse for a theory can be accessed academically.
" Translated " is not the correct word. The concept is called social Darwinism and has little to do with the theory of evolution by natural selection because it is not about the natural struggle for existence of individual organisms, but about how societies compete. This is not an evolutionary concept. Herbert Spenser devised this concept and Darwin did not have anything to do with it and really did not approve of the concept's tenets.
Badly. The theory of evolution by natural selection has to do with the natural world and the selection of individual organisms. Social Darwinism and like ideologies are biologically mistaken as the posit a form of group selection which has nothing to do with evolutionary theory but everything to do with social ideology trying to find scientific respectability.
Perhaps the best answer is "eat or be eaten" or " survive or die" or the "survival of the fittest"
which is not part of darwins theory of natural selction
A guy who had a debate about Darwins theory
Charles Darwins theory is wrong to religon as it is very clear god created the world. and theories like Darwins are wrong.
By Herbert Spenser's misunderstanding of the theory and his thinking that the theory had something to say about human institutions. Darwin wanted nothing to do with this and said as much.
Darwins theory of evolution :)
Darwins theory of evolution
because of religion
Survival of the fittest
fittest