Most alpha particles could move through the foil with little or no interference because of the empty space that makes up most of the atom. However, if an alpha particle made a direct hit on the nucleus of a gold atom, which has 79 protons, the alpha particle would be strongly repelled and bounce back.
Rutherford discovered the atomic nucleus and the proton.
A short answer for the Rutherford atomic model: the atom is composed from a central part - a nucleus, positively charged, surrounded by electrons - very small negative charged particles.
These conclusions are derived from the well known gold foil experiment and from other experiments of Rutherford and his collaborators.
Change the metal used as a target and account for differences in deflection patterns.
He didn't. He estimated the SIZE of the positively charged nucleus, concluding it was about .0001 the size of the atom itself.
Due to experimental errors and limitations in the procedure done in the laboratory.
dilute it
The experimental procedure for determining the formula for a hydrate that the formula for a hydrate is figured by the prefix and the number of water molecules that are in the compounds. For example is a prefix of di- and two water molecules. The formula is CaCl2 * 2H2O. The name for this is Calcium chloride dihydrate.
Experimentation is an operation or procedure carried out under controlled conditions in order to discover an unknown effect or law, to test or establish a hypothesis, or to illustrate a known law.
There are a few safe ways to determine if a base is stronger than an acid. There are specialized tests that you can buy.
So you can validate the results and determine causation.
Due to experimental errors and limitations in the procedure done in the laboratory.
Your question isn't valid because you need an experimental procedure in place before you determine the variables.
Double blind experiment.
When the means in all the groups are not equal, Tukey-Kramer procedure can help to determine which of the means are significantly different.
Variables
Some but not all scientific models are based on the ability to determine the likelihood that a given experimental outcome has happened by chance alone. If you have an accurate understanding of how the variables in the experiment change when nothing in particular is affecting them, then you have a way to establish some confidence that your outcome is the result of your experimental procedure and not the result of purely random events. The experimental 'lingo' is that the researcher has to determine if the 'Null Hypothesis' can be rejected. The Null Hypothesis is that the experimental outcome is not significantly different from what you would expect if the experiment had no effect at all.As an example, if the probability in the natural world is that some event will happen by chance only one tenth of one percent of the time, then when I observe that event as my experimental outcome, I can be reasonably sure that my procedure has brought about the event; it is so unlikely that it happened by chance. It is not perfect, but few scientific procedures are. This also highlights the importance of replicating studies or of doing meta-analyses of experimental data gathered in many experiments to further reduce the likelihood that observed outcomes are nothing more than chance events.
dilute it
Purpose, hypothesis, procedure, analysis
the values you actually get when you do the procedure, these are then compared to the standard values
The laws of all states are somewhat different you must determine what the procedure is for your particular state.
The experimental procedure.