Biblical scholars say that this Gospel was written approximately 70 CE, just as the First Roman-Jewish War was coming to an end, so it is very likely that 'Mark' was encouraged to write his Gospel by that traumatic event.
You have it a bit wrong. Yes, there are four Gospels but Mark is the name of only one: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
St. Mark wrote one of the four canoninical gospels.
'Seen with the same or one eye' are Matthew, Mark, and Luke.
It is a reading from one of the four gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke or John.
According to Acts 4:13, both Peter and his companion John were agrammatoi, a Greek word that literally means ‘unlettered’ or illiterate, meaning Peter could not have written any gospels or epistles. One of the reasons once put forward for Mark as the author of the gospel that now bears his name, was that Peter needed him to write down is recollections about Jesus. However, Bart D. Ehrman (Forged) says producing books in the name of Peter was a virtual cottage industry in the early church. Thus we have (among others) the non-canonical Gospel of Peter and the two canonical epistles attributed to him.
the 4 who DID are Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John
There are four Gospels in the Bible. The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. This is in terms of the written scriptures. In terms of the teaching of the New Testament, there is only one Gospel message of good news of salvation through Jesus Christ. There are at least 17 known gospels, of which four are in the New Testament - those now called the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
A:No, the apostle Matthew did not write any of the New Testament gospels. The four gospels were originally anonymous and were only attributed to the apostles whose names they now bear, later in the second century. Thus we only have the opinions of the Church Fathers as to who any of the authors were. Seeing a literary dependency among the synoptic gospels, they believed that Matthew, the disciple of Jesus, wrote the first gospel and that the gospels they attributed to Mark and Luke were based on copying and improving Matthew's Gospel. In fact, scholars now say that none of the gospels could have been written by an eyewitness to the events they portray.Scholars can demonstrate that Mark's Gospel was actually the earliest gospel and that Matthew's Gospel was largely based on it, with some 90 per cent of the verses in Mark, as well as containing further sayings material from the hypothetical 'Q' document. Clearly, a disciple of Jesus would not have needed to base almost his entire gospel on these prior sources. Matthew did not write the Gospel of Matthew.
St. Mark the Evangelist is one of the four authors of the New Testament Gospels. The city of Venice in Italy claims him as their patron saint, and his relics are said to be housed in St. Mark's Basilica in Venice. St. Mark is traditionally believed to have been a companion of St. Peter and traveled with him to preach the Gospel.
John the Baptist is not credited with writing any gospel.
St. Mark is traditionally believed to have written the Gospel of Mark, one of the four Gospels in the New Testament. He is also considered the founder of the Church of Alexandria in Egypt. St. Mark is recognized as one of the four Evangelists in Christian tradition.
A:Among the New Testament gospels, Matthew, Mark and Luke are known as synoptic ('seen with the same eye') gospels, because when laid sise by side in the original Greek language and seen with the same eye, it can be shown that two of these gospels must have been based on the third. The original of these gospels is now known to have been Mark's Gospel. On the other hand, when John's Gospel is laid alongside the others, its dependence is not immediately apparent. Because John was more loosely based on Luke and, to a lesser extent, Mark, there are few similarities in the text and even the storyline often differs. It is therefore not a synoptic gospel.The Gospel of John is not one of the "synoptic gospels"