answersLogoWhite

0

Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.

Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.

Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.

Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.

Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.

Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.

Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.

Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.

Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What was the name of the emperor that Caligula succeeded?

Caligula succeeded the emperor Tiberius.Caligula succeeded the emperor Tiberius.Caligula succeeded the emperor Tiberius.Caligula succeeded the emperor Tiberius.Caligula succeeded the emperor Tiberius.Caligula succeeded the emperor Tiberius.Caligula succeeded the emperor Tiberius.Caligula succeeded the emperor Tiberius.Caligula succeeded the emperor Tiberius.


What succeeded Augustus as emperor?

Augustus was succeeded by Tiberius.


Who ssucceeded Augustus as emperor?

Tiberius succeeded Augustus as emperor.


Who did the Roman Emperor Nero succeed?

The year after Nero's death is known as the year of the four emperors. Technically, Galba was the one who succeeded Nero, but he didn't last long and was overthrown by Otho, who in turn was overthrown by Vitellius., who in turn was overthrown by Vespasian.


Who succeeded Palpatine as emperor?

noone


Who succeeded Augustus as the next Julio-Claudian emperor?

Augustus was succeeded by Emperor Tiberius. He ruled from 14 AD to 37 AD.


Who succeeded roman empeor Titus?

Emperor Domitian succeeded his older brother Titus as the Roman Emperor after Titus' death in 81 AD.


Who succeeded Julius Caesar as emperor?

mantrell johnson


Who is Japanese emperor who died on 1-7-1989 succeeded by his son akihito?

Emperor Hirohito (posthumously called the Showa Emperor)


Succeeded parachute as emperor of the Incas?

Topa Inca. his son


Who succeede Tiberius as emperor of rome?

Caligula succeeded Tiberius.


What is the name of the emperor who came after Titus?

His younger brother Domitian succeeded him.