first the people would vote on which they wanted to be free or slave. then, they would compare them to the other state and which ever had the most free votes would be free and the other state would be a slave state
by voting
The only time they were given chance to vote on it was under the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the first and only time it was tried (with Kansas), it was a disaster. Every bully-boy in the land descended on Kansas to intimidate the voters and interrupt the elections.
Before the Civil War, the newer states relied on popular sovereignty, which is when people take a vote on being a free or slave state. Majority ruled. However after the Civil War, since THE Union won against the Confederates, the southern states were forced to expel slavery from their states and they had to take an oath that said that they would not bring slavery back.
It was meant to be Congress that would decide which states could practise slavery.
But when the Compromise of 1850 failed, Stephen Douglas of Illinois proposed that the people of each new state should vote on the issue ('Popular Sovereignty').
That may have sounded reasonable. But it suffered from a dangerous flaw. By allowing one state at a time to vote, it attracted every bully-boy in America to that one state, to cause maximum mayhem. When it was first tried, in Kansas, the result went down in history as 'Bleeding Kansas'.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act provided that the citizens of the territories would determine whether they would be free or slave states for themselves in a process known as Popular Sovereignty. Today we might call such a process Self-Determination.
popular sovereignty
In both Kansas and Nebraska, they were admitted states with popular sovereignty, which means the state chooses if it is a slave state or a free state.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was proposed by Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois, in order to create the territories of Kansas and Nebraska, and to ensure that future settlers in those territories would have the authority to determine whether slavery would be permitted with these territories.
the fugitive slave act of 1850 and the kansas-nebraska act of 1854
It could allow the creation of new slave-states, if the locals voted for it.
So the region would become a slave-free state
the kansas- nebraska act
It was put to a local vote.
Nebraska will become a free state and kansas a slave state.
Yes, the State Nebraska was organized after the kansas-nebraska compromise. The state was selected as a slave state to balance out the slave states and non slave states since Kansas chose to be a free state.
The Kansas - Nebraska Act of 1854 enabled voters in the US Territories of Kansas and Nebraska vote as to whether be free or slave States once they entered the Union.
the Nebraska territory would open up and be divided into 2 states: nebraska and Kansas. originally, nebraska would have been the free state and kansas the slave state BUT nebraska and kansas would be decided by popular sovereignty
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was created in 1854. It created territories of Kansas and Nebraska, opened new land for settlement and allowed white male settlers in those territories to determine whether slavery would be allowed.
In both Kansas and Nebraska, they were admitted states with popular sovereignty, which means the state chooses if it is a slave state or a free state.
A provision allowed for Nebraska to vote down the line on their status as Free or Slave.
It let settlers decide if they wanted a slave state or not, set boundaries between Kansas and Nebraska, and made both a state.
The dispute was over whether Kansas would be admitted as a Slave State or a Free State. The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed Kansas to enter as a Slave State if Nebraska entered as a Free one. The "bleeding" was from advocates on both sides trying to suppress the other by murder and terrorism.
the nebraska territory would open up and be divided into 2 states: nebraska and kansas. originally, nebraska would have been the free state and kansas the slave state BUT nebraska and kansas would be decided by popular sovereignty