answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

John Marshall had a loose interpretation of the Constitution while Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a strict interpretation of it. John Marshall strongly believed in the elastic clause (the necessary and proper clause) which meant: "The Congress shall have Power - To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof". So he thought that if a law was needed, then it could be added and adjusted into the Constitution and one didn't have to stick to the exact words of the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a strict construction of the Constitution, but his actions such as the Louisiana Purchase and the Embargo Act showed loose interpretations because neither one of those were written in the Constitution. He very rarely showed a strict interpretation where he stuck directly to the Constitution, so they really weren't that different in views even though in titles they were.

User Avatar

Freeda Kris

Lvl 13
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

6mo ago

John Marshall's interpretation of the Constitution was more expansive and favored a strong federal government. He believed in a loose construction of the Constitution and saw the necessary and proper clause as granting the federal government broad powers. In contrast, Thomas Jefferson had a strict constructionist view, interpreting the Constitution narrowly and emphasizing states' rights and limited federal power.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How was john marshalls interpretation of the constitution different from thomas jeffersons?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How was John Marshalls interpretation of the Constitution different from that of Thomas Jefferson's?

Marshall believed the Constitution implied strong state powers; Jefferson did not.


How was john marshalls interpretation of the constitution from thomas jeffersons?

John Marshall had a loose interpretation of the Constitution while Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a strict interpretation of it. John Marshall strongly believed in the elastic clause (the necessary and proper clause) which meant: "The Congress shall have Power - To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof". So he thought that if a law was needed, then it could be added and adjusted into the Constitution and one didn't have to stick to the exact words of the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a strict construction of the Constitution, but his actions such as the Louisiana Purchase and the Embargo Act showed loose interpretations because neither one of those were written in the Constitution. He very rarely showed a strict interpretation where he stuck directly to the Constitution, so they really weren't that different in views even though in titles they were.


How was john marshalls interpretation of the constitution different from thomas Jefferson?

John Marshall had a loose interpretation of the Constitution while Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a strict interpretation of it. John Marshall strongly believed in the elastic clause (the necessary and proper clause) which meant: "The Congress shall have Power - To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof". So he thought that if a law was needed, then it could be added and adjusted into the Constitution and one didn't have to stick to the exact words of the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a strict construction of the Constitution, but his actions such as the Louisiana Purchase and the Embargo Act showed loose interpretations because neither one of those were written in the Constitution. He very rarely showed a strict interpretation where he stuck directly to the Constitution, so they really weren't that different in views even though in titles they were.


How was thurgood marshalls childhood?

he was punished in school for his mis behavior by being forced to read the constitution and it was FRICKEN AWESOME


When was Marshalls created?

Marshalls was created in 1956.


How long is marshalls open on Sundays?

Marshalls is open from 11am-8pm


What brands do 'Marshalls Shoes' sell?

Marshalls Shoes sells many different shoe brands. These brands include Nike, Adidas, New Balance, Vans Off The Wall, Converse, Reebok, and even Sperry.


Is marshalls expensive?

Marshalls is not expensive. They are a deeply discounted store which sells designer fashions and shoes. Marshalls is a good alternative to the regular department stores.


what was the reason of marshalls plan?

i have no answer


What cases involve being arrested by federal marshalls?

Marshalls deal with Federal prisoners and their transfer between, to, and from courts and prisons.


Whos resposiblity is it to transport federal prisoners and to secure federal courthouses?

The U.S. Marshalls Service


How do you spell the store marashals?

Marshalls.