Hand issues such as taxes and budget for the colony
beacuse legislative is different than representative
In a direct democracy, anyone can participate in the government. But in a representative democracy, you must be elected.
Representative government rather than totalitarian rule
In a direct democracy, anyone can participate in the government. But in a representative democracy, you must be elected.
In a direct democracy, anyone can participate in the government. But in a representative democracy, you must be elected.
The President is in a different branch than the judiciary branch of government.
No that is why I am asking
The 13 colonies wanted to form a representative government in order to form a single voice that would represent them in a more perfect union. They didn't want any more than one voice representing them.
They didn't. They based it upon the Common Law from England.
Answer it!
Technically, no. By definition, all republics are representative in some form, since "republic" means "rule by elected officials", and elected officials are representative of the people who elected them. To use the term "representative republic" is just redundant. While it was used in the past by at least one of the founding fathers of the United States of America, it actually doesn't mean any more than just saying "republic". However, there are many countries that call themselves republics that are actually run by military dictatorships or religious leaders, and do not really have representative government, so the term "representative republic" could be used to emphasize countries that are truly representative.
because then by choosing the people for state mayor would be easier than trying to control the nation as one