They're the same thing.
A government controlled by a Tsar (Czar) is called a Tsarist Autocracy. Essentially a form of absolute monarchy.
Russia was an absolute monarchy when ruled by a tsar, meaning that the tsar had unrestricted power over the state and was not bound by a constitution or laws. The tsar claimed divine right to rule, positioning himself as both a political and spiritual leader. This form of governance persisted until the Russian Revolution of 1917, which led to the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and the end of the monarchy.
No. A Tsar is always the head of an hereditary monarchy.
Tsar Nicholas II was the absolute ruler of Russia from 1894-1917
Tsarists, supporters of the tsar's reign. Mostly, they were people who had influence and power under the tsar.
Russia was too big and therefore could not work with autocracy - the rule of one man
Ivan the Terrible introduced the tradition of autocratic rule in Russia, consolidating power in the hands of the tsar and diminishing the influence of the nobility. This centralization of authority established a precedent for absolute monarchy that would persist for centuries, shaping the governance of Russia. His use of the Oprichnina, a state policy marked by political repression and terror, further instilled a culture of fear and loyalty to the tsar, influencing Russian political dynamics into the 20th century. This legacy of autocracy and centralized power played a crucial role in the evolution of the Russian state and its relationship with the populace.
The autocracy in Russia was effectively established by Ivan III, also known as Ivan the Great, in the late 15th century. He centralized power, expanded the territory, and laid the foundations for the Russian state, which paved the way for later rulers to adopt autocratic governance. This tradition was further solidified by his grandson, Ivan IV, known as Ivan the Terrible, who proclaimed himself Tsar and expanded the autocratic nature of the Russian monarchy.
Autocracy caused the Russian Revolution by making the people greatly unhappy. The tsar Nicholas II ran the country with the help of only a few ministers, and the people wanted a more democratic form of government. Nicholas believed that the absolute power of tzars should be preserved, and kept on ruling by himself.
Absolute monarchs in Russia were know as the Tsar. pronounced zar, also written as tzar.
Seeing that the revolutionaries were revolting against monarchy, I doubt that Tsar Nicholas II was a member of any revolutionary group.
Tsar Nicholas II of Russia ruled under an autocratic form of government, where he held absolute power and authority over the state. His reign was characterized by a lack of political freedom and repression of dissent, as he believed in the divine right of kings. The autocracy faced significant challenges, leading to widespread discontent and ultimately contributing to the Russian Revolution of 1917, which ended his rule.