Well, a wise man once said that "Be it said or done, or shucka my cocka."
(Franklin, 2ndPamphlet 1777)
That was how the resolved it. They lead the union across the states and told them to solve this problem or else! It was Roger Sherman himself saying that 1 out of 3 negros from the south would become the Northern states.
If there are disputes over authority between local, state, or the national government, how are the disputes resolved?
The Great Compromise resolved the dispute over the New Jersey and Virginia plans. The Virginia Plan wanted representation to go by population. The House of Representatives resolved this issue, using population to determine how many representatives a state would receive. The New Jersey Plan wanted equal representation for all states. The Senate resolved this issue by allowing the same number of representatives to all states, regardless of their size.
I believe the case that resolved the diferences between "States Rights" and the National Government was called the American Civil War.
What increase the likelihood that the states would dispute each other's claims to western territories
The adoption of a bicameral legislature with the lower house selected on the basis of population and the upper house apportioned equally among the states resolved the debate over the ratification of the Constitution.
The compromise between slave states and free states was resolved by the 3/5ths Compromise. The southern states wanted to have slaves count as part of the population. The free states did not. They eventually agreed that the 3 out of every 5 slaves would be counted. The Great Compromise was when the legislature was agreed to be made of 2 houses, one upper and one lower. The upper house would have equal representation and the lower would be have the states represented by population.
The framers resolved the conflict between large and small states by creating a bicameral legislature with the House of Representatives based on population and the Senate with equal representation for each state. This compromise balanced the needs of both types of states in the lawmaking process.
The nouns are: "boundary" "dispute" "United States" "Spain"
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was proposed by Roger Sherman during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It resolved the dispute between larger states, which favored representation based on population, and smaller states, which wanted equal representation. The compromise established a bicameral legislature, consisting of the House of Representatives, with representation based on population, and the Senate, where each state has two senators, ensuring both types of representation. This framework is still in use in the United States Congress today.
In some countries and US States, it has. The issue has not been resolved on the federal level in the United States.
The conflict of the 1840s likely refers to various events such as the Mexican-American War or the Oregon Boundary Dispute. These conflicts were resolved through treaties and negotiations, such as the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, which ended the Mexican-American War, and the Oregon Treaty of 1846, which settled the boundary between the United States and British North America.
The Great Compromise settled the method of representation in the legislativebranch (the US Congress). Small states wanted equal representation(equality by state), and large states wanted representationbased on population (equality by vote). ... In the House of Representatives, representation was based on population.