Want this question answered?
Whenever the Supreme Court upholds the right of one group to the free exercise of its religion, it could be argued that the Court limits the right of another group that considers the free exercise of its own religion to be to influence the beliefs of others.
Whenever the Supreme Court upholds the right of one group to the free exercise of its religion, it could be argued that the Court limits the right of another group that considers the free exercise of its own religion to be to influence the beliefs of others.
supreme court's decision is the fynal decision. supreme court can ineterpret the law. supreme court hav a right to punish the personif he/she breaks the law.
supreme cort is the protector of funda mental rights.
ALL lower courts, both state and federal, can be reviewed by the Supreme Court. Every court in the nation is subordinate to the US Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court might be the final court of appeal in the United States. But, it has happened in some situations where the Supreme Court has told a state that they can deal with an appeal if the Federal court is not the right jurisdiction.
The viewpoint of the U.S. Supreme Court is somewhat to the right of Vlad the Impaler.
The right to a lawyer.
Because then people know right away the difference. Justices=Supreme Court. Judges=Normal Courts acting under the Supreme Court.
the right to interpret laws
The Supreme Court is appointed by the President. You wouldn't be appointed right out of law school, you need experience. Appointments to the Supreme Court are for life.
They can appeal to the United States Supreme Court to have the law be declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court's right to judicial review.