Want this question answered?
Our Prime Minister is an autocrat: he makes all the decisions for the government without consulting the cabinet or Parliament. Dictator,czar,and emperor are each a type of autocrat. Idi Amin was a well-known African autocrat.
The American Government is based off of the Roman Empire's government. the expression "do what the Romans do" is very appropriate for how many things the American Government has adopted as well.
If the person is the president of a corporation which is called an industrial empire, he would probably not like to be called an emperor. If the person is a dictator who made himself emperor as well as president, I suppose you could call him an emperor. Emperor is usually a title applied to king-like figures. President usually indicates an elected leader. The two titles are contradictory.
You have much power in the government to create new laws and make changes to existing ones as well as a lot of other things. It is quite a powerful position.
They take peoples money that way we can pay taxes!!! - they do more than that 1. they control who you marry and when you can marry someone 2. they control when you can drive 3. they tell you what you can and can't do 4. they control your toilets 5. they say what food you can buy 6. they say what toys your kids can play with 7. they say what type of home you can have 8. they determine how much you get paid 9. they make kids go to school 10. they control your money
It had a theocratic monarchy, where the emperor or tlatoani was the head of the government as well as the chief priest.
Akbar the Great was an illiterate. Akbar's education had not gone well both because of the stress of a family on the run as well as his inability to learn to read or write, surely because of dyslexia.
The emperor chose the patriarch of Constantinople, leading the Church official in the Byzantine Empire.The emperor became an autocrat and the head of the church as well as the state.
Akbar was a great mughal emperor and a tolerant ruler. His tolerance also kept the mughal empire united. He was a great warrier and won many battles. Though he was illiterate he managed his empire very well. Babur and Akbar brought the Mughal rule to most of India. They used artillery and swift cavalry tactics vs. their enemies the capture Delhi.
Akbar his father killed him due to Adham killed the new prime minister Akbar chose and he as well tried to kill Akbar.
Akbar is actually a Mughal Emperor who was The ruler in India during the early 1700s. Before Akbar's rule Mughal era was not well known. Akbar was very good with keeping perfect political relations. This ruler singlehandedly almost unfied India in all its multi-ethinicity. However he was still an invader from the west. Hence it is quite ambiguious where he lies on terms of being a good or bad ruler. But in comparison to his grandson aurangazeb who desecrated andd destroyed temples, Akbar was a very good ruler. So yea make your choice.
Well, its government is a lot more complicated than ours. First of all, they are a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary government. Just to let you know, they still have branches and congress like ours. Although, Japan has an emperor, which is like a king or dictator is the only thing that is different. Japan Emperor right now is Emperor Akihito, commonly referred to as the Mikado?
Well i think that the government control deforestation as they should control all f the nations natural beauty.
well, Augustus brought the romans in to a pax romana
well they have the government for that
Anees Akbar, who is a well-known modern poet, was born on December 25, 1987.
Well that is a tough question. Akbar had over 5000 women in his harem. There is not a site that lists who he had children with or how many at this time.