If the person is the president of a corporation which is called an industrial empire, he would probably not like to be called an emperor. If the person is a dictator who made himself emperor as well as president, I suppose you could call him an emperor. Emperor is usually a title applied to king-like figures. President usually indicates an elected leader. The two titles are contradictory.
When many lands are ruled by one country, it is called an empire.More then likely, that is called an empire. It could also be called a Kingdom
Great Society
They can't but, if the president could fire the vice president, this could mean that the person who is the vice president was not the person citizens voted for in the presidential elections. First, that could cause anger amongst people who would feel cheated/betrayed. Secondly, the president could carefully select who they wanted to be vice president so that the vice president agrees with everything the president says, giving more power to the president (turning the vice president into a 'puppet leader').
When the emperor died he had two sons. Because when a man died, his belongings would go to his sons, the empire was divided in two halves. Each son of the roman emperor got a halve of the empire. If he would have had 3 sons, it would have been divided in 3 parts.
It could be called a lot of things, depending on the circumstances:AssassinationForced Resignation (if they were about to be impeached)Untimely deathHeart AttackAccidental deathStrokeResignation for health reasons
Your question does not have a verb. You need to specify what it is that an emperor could do.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic Rome did not have any political position that could be likened to a president. They had consuls as their top officials but it was a shared office. However during the principate the emperor could be considered a president in a very loose way.During the republic Rome did not have any political position that could be likened to a president. They had consuls as their top officials but it was a shared office. However during the principate the emperor could be considered a president in a very loose way.During the republic Rome did not have any political position that could be likened to a president. They had consuls as their top officials but it was a shared office. However during the principate the emperor could be considered a president in a very loose way.During the republic Rome did not have any political position that could be likened to a president. They had consuls as their top officials but it was a shared office. However during the principate the emperor could be considered a president in a very loose way.During the republic Rome did not have any political position that could be likened to a president. They had consuls as their top officials but it was a shared office. However during the principate the emperor could be considered a president in a very loose way.During the republic Rome did not have any political position that could be likened to a president. They had consuls as their top officials but it was a shared office. However during the principate the emperor could be considered a president in a very loose way.During the republic Rome did not have any political position that could be likened to a president. They had consuls as their top officials but it was a shared office. However during the principate the emperor could be considered a president in a very loose way.During the republic Rome did not have any political position that could be likened to a president. They had consuls as their top officials but it was a shared office. However during the principate the emperor could be considered a president in a very loose way.During the republic Rome did not have any political position that could be likened to a president. They had consuls as their top officials but it was a shared office. However during the principate the emperor could be considered a president in a very loose way.
It depends. There could be one emperor or several co-emperors.
yes ----- The question of whether Charlemagne was Emperor of Rome was raised as soon as he was crowned emperor. Personally, I would say he was not, but others could disagree, and with some reason. The West Roman Empire was long gone, so clearly he was not emperor of that. The East Roman Empire still existed at the time he was crowned, under the name Empire of the Roman People. Today we call it the Byzantine Empire. Empress Irene, who was its monarch at the time Charlemagne was crowned, was quite upset that Charlemagne was crowned emperor of a country with the same name as her own, especially because it seemed to imply that he was the rightful ruler of her empire. Today, we use the term Carolingian Empire for Charlemagne's empire, and the term Byzantine Empire for Irene's, to avoid confusion. Neither term was used at the time. The Carolingian Empire dissolved, but was reestablished as what we call the Holy Roman Empire, a term used while it existed, though originally, it, too, was called the Roman Empire. The City of Rome, by the way, was not part of either the Carolingian Empire or the Byzantine Empire, but was part of the Papal States.
I think its because That Constantine thought it would be too hard for 1 emperor to rule by himself so he divided the empire into two and sent one of his loyal servants to go rule the western part of Rome.
it depends actually... A King rules over an kingdom. I'm pretty sure an Emperor would rule over an empire, but I could be wrong...
Imperator (emperor). Or he could be unofficially called Tsar.
Moctazuma was a Aztec emperor and Aztec people hated him because of his unresponcible relationships with it's empire. He was the 16th century emperor. He was emperor who was sacrificing the prisoners. it could be 300 people at once, everyone individually, and than he was pushing the dead body down the stairs. The people were boiling the body and making soup. The emperor was eating this soup and that's why people hated him.
Yes, it was the birthplace of the man who ruled the greatest empire ever! I suppose that could be called somewhat major.Yes, it was the birthplace of the man who ruled the greatest empire ever! I suppose that could be called somewhat major.Yes, it was the birthplace of the man who ruled the greatest empire ever! I suppose that could be called somewhat major.Yes, it was the birthplace of the man who ruled the greatest empire ever! I suppose that could be called somewhat major.
I believe that county does not exist in the world today. However Japan has an emperor and a prime minister, however it does not have a king as a kingdom cannot be an empire aswell. But if you want to have unofficial titles included and would be willing to change king to king OR queen, then you could include Great Britain when it was an empire as it also had a prime inster and a queen, she could also be described as an emperor although it needs to be remebered that she was never given the official title of emperor. Or unofficial for that matter.
The female equivalent of emperor is empress.