Wiki User
∙ 5y agoDuring the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoWiki User
∙ 5y agoRome had an empire during both the republican and imperial periods. The Republic was ruled by popular assemblies - Centuriate, Tribal and Plebeian, with day-to-day action by the Consuls and Senate. The Empire was ruled by a coalition of Princeps/Emperor and the Senate, the assemblies gone. Also gone in the Empire were the tribunes of the plebs who had a veto in the Senate.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoDuring the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThe Empire was virtually a Dictatorship and the republic was a democracy
Wiki User
∙ 5y agoThe Republic was power sharing between the senate and citizens. The Empire was power sharing between emperor and senate.
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoIt had the Princeps Augustus sitting with reserve powers which could over-ride the Senate. The popular assemblies - Centuriate, Tribal and Plebeian were disposed of.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoif you want to know get a life
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoit is sparta
Its leaders saw themselves as roman emperors, and theirand their government was in many ways a direct continuation of the eastern portion of the late roman empire
A republic is democratic while an empire is not. An empire has one leader in charge of all the laws while a republic may have one supreme leader but several other people (like a Congress or Parliament) to approve laws.
The empire of Charlemagne was in several ways a successor to the Roman Empire. Firstly, the Pope officially crowned him Emperor of the Romans". He took most of the former Roman lands in Europe, but expanded northward rater than to the south. He filled the power vacuum and drove away the barbarians who filled Europe when Rome fell. However, in most ways his empire was more akin the the Feudal kingdoms to come.
One way that Diocletian tried to save the Roman Empire was by dividing the Empire into two halves, West and East.
It had already been different before. The Greeks retained their culture an language, and this had been developing of its own accord, though they did get Roman influences. They also had their own version of Christianity.
the roman republic was the first to think of checks and balances.
it was different the wright wayy''' xD
Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.
Its leaders saw themselves as roman emperors, and theirand their government was in many ways a direct continuation of the eastern portion of the late roman empire
which political events lol
Please specify which development you are referring to.
in what way was Christianity a unifying force in the roman
it was different the wright wayy''' xD
A republic is democratic while an empire is not. An empire has one leader in charge of all the laws while a republic may have one supreme leader but several other people (like a Congress or Parliament) to approve laws.
The empire of Charlemagne was in several ways a successor to the Roman Empire. Firstly, the Pope officially crowned him Emperor of the Romans". He took most of the former Roman lands in Europe, but expanded northward rater than to the south. He filled the power vacuum and drove away the barbarians who filled Europe when Rome fell. However, in most ways his empire was more akin the the Feudal kingdoms to come.
The ancient Roman republic in general terms fits the description of a republic in the following ways: 1. A balance of power between the Senate and the Assembly is the center of what defines a republic; 2. Elections were held to fill important official positions; 3. The Roman republic had checks and balances through the election of consuls and Tribunes;and 4. Written laws created what is termed a government of laws not of men.
The Byzantines did not follow the Roman ways. They were the Romans. Byzantine and Byzantine Empire are terms which have been coined by historians. The former first appeared in 1648 and the latter became popular in the 19th century. It is a term which is used to indicate the eastern part of the Roman Empire which continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years after the fall of the western part of this empire. The people in question did not even know this term and called their empire Roman Empire or empire of the Romans. Although this empire was centred on Greece, these peoples regarded themselves as Romans. This was because in 212 the emperor Caracalla extended Romans citizenship to all the freeborn males in the Roman Empire, regardless of ethnicity. Therefore, the people in question were Roman citizens.