henry was wanting dicorce, which chruch didnt alow and luther wanted real change for the sake of the church teachings
martin Luther king
Because coloreds always up to no good.
Martin Luther King and Martin Luther are two completely different people. Martin Luther King was born in the United States.
Black people would not have any right and America would be a different place. would not be able to go to certain places like most coffee shops and white people would go to a different school than black people. are only 2 reasons what would happen if Martin Luther King Jr. did not exist.
The pope excommunicated Luther because his teachings were heretical.
There's a 'junior' that makes your question totally different. Martin Luther King and Martin Luther King Jr. are totally two different people. And yes, Martin Luther King Jr. surely helped. But I don't think Martin Luther King did.
He was peaceful a hard worker and made a change for more closer info. to what your looking for on martin Luther king Jr. go to www.biography.com and type martin Luther king Jr. in to the search
luther is a troble maker and rob is a boy who gets into his trobles.
heeiii
Without Martin Luther King Jr. we would most likely still have segregation.
different parts
one of the most obvious similarities is that both of them broke away from the catholic church. another similarity that is not as obvious is that both broke up monastaries. however they broke them up for many different reasons. both changed stuff from catholisim. Henry viii allowed divorces, while martin Luther change indulgences.