they were born at home
he was born in his house because in the 1400's babies were not born in hospitals
Yes, they do.
Yes, babies were born in hospitals 100 years ago, but it was less common than it is today. Home births were more common in the early 20th century, with hospitals gradually becoming the favored location for childbirth as medical advancements improved.
Yes there were hospitals in the 1600's ...... if there wernt where would babies be born and people be curedNotice: The first guy to answer this didn't think about this answer to HIS question: babies can really be born anywhere, and illnesses were often cured at home. HE DID NOT POST THE BOLD PART OF THE ANSWER
Babies weren't born in hospitals in the Tudor times; women gave birth at home.
He was born before hospitals were created.
I dunno, there are thousands. You'd probably want to call a lot of hospitals...
Neonatal doctors specialize in taking care of newborn babies. They work in hospitals, and take care of babies that are premature or sick when they are born.
so that it can read to the babies
He wouldn’t have been born in a hospital. He would have been born at home maybe with help from a midwife for his mother. Babies in his time were not born in hospitals.
it's really bad for the baby, babies born prematurely, babies born too small, babies who die before they can be born at all.
around 2,000 each end every second two are delivered every 5 seconds,