The Etruscna were not relevant to the founding of Rome. Rome was founded by Romulus by uniting the peoples on the settlements on hills which became the famous Seven Hills of Rome into a unified state under his Rule. Romulus was also the first king of Rome.
The foundation of Rome was said to have involved a fusion between the Latins who lived in the septimontium (seven spurs on three of the seven hills (the Palatine, the Esquiline and the Caelian) and Sabines who settled on two hills (the Quirinal and the Viminal)
No.
The Etruscans
No.
They were bithces
The Etruscans were a civilization that lived on the northern part of the Italian Peninsula. They were the people who founded Rome. Later, the Romans revolted from them.
"???? there was no rome in 750 bc" well, not exactly. The traditionally accepted date for the founding of Rome was either 753 or 751 BCE. Could you instead be thinking of the sack of Rome by the Galatian Celts in 386 BCE?
Although the theory that the Etruscans conquered Rome is very fashionable, it is just that, a theory. It is based on unproven assumptions and it evidence base is flimsy, to say the least. It is most likely that the Etruscans did not conquer Rome. There is no record of it. More recent archaeological finds seem to suggest a different picture.
They didn't "win" Rome. They created it. Before the Etruscans there may have been a small village of people, but it wasn't a city state nor what we think of as "Rome."
Etruscan were the barbarians of Rome.
The Etruscans
The Etruscans .
Early Rome was ruled by the Etruscans.Early Rome was ruled by the Etruscans.Early Rome was ruled by the Etruscans.Early Rome was ruled by the Etruscans.Early Rome was ruled by the Etruscans.Early Rome was ruled by the Etruscans.Early Rome was ruled by the Etruscans.Early Rome was ruled by the Etruscans.Early Rome was ruled by the Etruscans.