I presume you mean someone who is excessively loyal to his a party. Such a person would obviously vote for all his parties candidates and positions, that is vote a straight-party ticket.
loyalist?
False About half the states have state laws that require the elector to cast his vote according to popular vote. The others do not. However, the electors are chosen for their party loyalty and have worked hard and contributed money to elect their party's candidate. It is highly unlikely that one would be a traitor to his party. The votes are not secret.
Straight-party ticket
Either split ticket vote, straight ticket vote , democratic vote, republican vote correct answer...straight party ballot/vote
Probably because party members will not always vote according to how the party leader says they should vote, but rather according to their constituents and what they think would be better. In Congress, majority rules; and in some cases, the majority party leader may have a hand in whether or not specific legislation gets passed.
A 'Loyalist' , also known as 'Royalist' was somebody who remained true to the British Crown and Empire. The Loyalist Party was what they belonged to/
Because there would be no other party to vote for, and so there would be no choice or opportunity to voice. There would be no opposition for the goverment, so they could do what they want with nobody to say anything against them or vote them out of power. A democracy has to have a choice of different parties.Because there would be no other party to vote for, and so there would be no choice or opportunity to voice. There would be no opposition for the goverment, so they could do what they want with nobody to say anything against them or vote them out of power. A democracy has to have a choice of different parties.Because there would be no other party to vote for, and so there would be no choice or opportunity to voice. There would be no opposition for the goverment, so they could do what they want with nobody to say anything against them or vote them out of power. A democracy has to have a choice of different parties.Because there would be no other party to vote for, and so there would be no choice or opportunity to voice. There would be no opposition for the goverment, so they could do what they want with nobody to say anything against them or vote them out of power. A democracy has to have a choice of different parties.Because there would be no other party to vote for, and so there would be no choice or opportunity to voice. There would be no opposition for the goverment, so they could do what they want with nobody to say anything against them or vote them out of power. A democracy has to have a choice of different parties.Because there would be no other party to vote for, and so there would be no choice or opportunity to voice. There would be no opposition for the goverment, so they could do what they want with nobody to say anything against them or vote them out of power. A democracy has to have a choice of different parties.Because there would be no other party to vote for, and so there would be no choice or opportunity to voice. There would be no opposition for the goverment, so they could do what they want with nobody to say anything against them or vote them out of power. A democracy has to have a choice of different parties.Because there would be no other party to vote for, and so there would be no choice or opportunity to voice. There would be no opposition for the goverment, so they could do what they want with nobody to say anything against them or vote them out of power. A democracy has to have a choice of different parties.Because there would be no other party to vote for, and so there would be no choice or opportunity to voice. There would be no opposition for the goverment, so they could do what they want with nobody to say anything against them or vote them out of power. A democracy has to have a choice of different parties.Because there would be no other party to vote for, and so there would be no choice or opportunity to voice. There would be no opposition for the goverment, so they could do what they want with nobody to say anything against them or vote them out of power. A democracy has to have a choice of different parties.Because there would be no other party to vote for, and so there would be no choice or opportunity to voice. There would be no opposition for the goverment, so they could do what they want with nobody to say anything against them or vote them out of power. A democracy has to have a choice of different parties.
Democrats, and then only if they are registered to vote in their county.
Everyone does NOT have to vote. The individual has the choice, vote or don't vote. Besides, you don't vote for a Prime Minister. You vote for a political party. The party of your choice. The leader of the party which wins (the one which gets most votes) the election will become Prime Minister. If you didn't give the population the choice every few years to keep or dismiss the party in power then what you would have would be a dictatorship or a 1 party state, which amounts to the same thing. It's called democracy.
only smart people
loyalist?
Loyalist would be a simile for "devoted". Your sentence would read: "Governor xyz is a loyalist (devoted to) the Republican views on abortion.
Only registered democrats.
No. If you do not vote, your vote is wasted. No party can lay claim to it.
Yes i would, i will tell them if they're right or wrong. I would not run for elector unless I could conscientiously vote for the candidate of my party.
what party does union workers are more likely to vote for
I don,t believe that Jesus Christ would vote for either party. Both Democrat and Republican Parties are corrupt.