The president would have all the power and make decisions left and right that might hurt a nation. Or, he might have a need for power all to himself, and abuse it.
-Angela Sarukhanyan
Under the US Constitution, there can only be one President at a time. If we had two Presidents from different parties they would constantly battle over policies, and the US government would be even less efficient than it is today.We experimented with allowing the President and Vice-President to represent two different parties (for example, the second President, John Adams, was a Federalist, but his Vice-President, Thomas Jefferson, was a Democratic-Republican), but that didn't work very well because they had such different ideas about how government should be run.
The President. (I'm not sure if this is right)
The US has only one president and he is the chief executive over the US government.
the president
In the US, National Parks may only be declared by an act of the U.S. Congress and signed into law by the President. Other countries may have different rules.
president only / executive
The only president in the government is the President of the United States. The individual states have a Governor as the head of the executive branch.
you would be president.
State government doesn’t have a cabinet. Only the president has one.
The President (Executive Branch) The president is commander in chief of the army, but only congress can declare war. So even if the president ordered the soldiers to go to a different country, he would not be able to declare war. Congress would have to do that part.
The president is the only one who "vetoes" bills
Not a different government; Romania is now - but only theoretically - an independent and democratic country.