If Earth's distance from the Sun increased by four times, its orbital speed would decrease significantly. According to Kepler's Third Law of Planetary Motion, the square of the orbital period is proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of the orbit. Therefore, with an increased distance, Earth would take longer to complete an orbit, resulting in a slower speed, roughly one-half of its current average orbital velocity.
how does earths distance from the sun change throughout the year
The Earth's path around the sun follows a slightly elliptical orbit rather than a perfect circle. This means that its distance from the sun can vary slightly throughout the year, but it always follows a predictable and consistent pattern.
When the distance between the centers of two planets decreases to 1/10th of the original distance,the gravitational force between them increases to 100 times the original force.
The force of gravity between two bodies decreases when the distance between them is increased. This relationship follows an inverse square law, meaning that the force of gravity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the bodies. Therefore, if the distance is increased by a factor of 4, the force of gravity will decrease by a factor of 16.
seasons are caused by the tilt of the earth. since the earth is in a slight eliptical orbit around the sun, when we are closer to the sun in January is where the northern hemisphere will still have winter and further from the sun in July when summer occurs. this is expected to flip in 26,000 years because of earths 3rd axis known as axial precession
how does earths distance from the sun change throughout the year
i think it is weathering
If Earth's mass increased by four times, the speed of its orbit around the Sun would not change significantly, as orbital speed is primarily determined by the gravitational pull of the Sun and the distance from it. According to Kepler's laws of planetary motion, the speed of an orbiting body depends on the mass of the central body (the Sun, in this case) and the distance from it, not the mass of the orbiting body itself. Therefore, while Earth's mass increase would affect its gravitational influence on nearby objects, it would not alter its orbital speed around the Sun.
its to far away
The change in distance is not very significant. Note that when it is Summer in the northern hemisphere, it is Winter in the south, and vice versa. This has nothing to do with the distance from the Sun, which is practically the same for North and South.
If you are adding tiles to any side of a figure, then you are increasing its total surfgace area and, of course, the distance around the figure ( perimeter) is also increased.
Not much would change. Note that the seasons are NOT related to changes in the distance from the Sun.
Increasing the distance on a screw does not change the direction of the force, but it requires more force to turn the screw due to the increased mechanical advantage.
The seasons change NOT because the Earth rotates, but because of our revelution around the sun. It is summer when the northern hemisphere is tilted toward the sun. the seasons have nothing to do with the distance to the sun. the Eath is closest to the sun in winter.
Speed changes when an object either increases or decreases its velocity over time. This can be due to factors such as acceleration, deceleration, or changes in direction. Speed is a scalar quantity that measures the rate at which an object covers distance.
There is a change in the amount of energy from the sun reaching the earth due to the elliptical nature of earths orbit around the sun, but the limits of this change are small compared to the effect of the tilt of the earths axis, and its tendency to remain parrallel throughout its orbit of the sun. For evidence, the fact that the northern and southern hemispheres have summer and winter at opposite times of the year from each other despite being exactly the same distance from the sun should be pretty convincing.
Work is the product of (force) x (distance).If, as you allege, the force increased but the work didn't change, thenthe distance must have decreased, by exactly the same factor as theincrease in the force, so that their product is not changed.