The animals help the tree grow so if the animals die the tree would just start to die because there would be no nutrients coming to it
No, trees provide oxygen for us to survive. If they did not live longer we would have less oxygen. Also certain animals live and eat off of trees and we eat animals, without the trees those animals would die off and we may survive but more likely perish. Hope it helped
No, trees provide oxygen for us to survive. If they did not live longer we would have less oxygen. Also certain animals live and eat off of trees and we eat animals, without the trees those animals would die off and we may survive but more likely perish. Hope it helped
it will suffer because it wont have animals to carry its seeds to another place.
A direct nuclear blast - nothing. However it is said that cockroaches would possibly survive radiation where other animals would be killed.
it killed them it killed animals that live in trees by cutting down their the wood from that tree they would put supporters in the mine to stop it from calapsing on top of them
Because animls feed us and help the environment such as giving life to the trees which give us oxygen in which we need to survive. Without wild animals all life would die. Even the trees. So we would all suffocate.
The percentage of animals would be 70 % to 80% of animals are killed for there fur.
Well there would be less trees because animals fertilize trees.
if your talking about the people who live in the rain forest they have stilts on the bottom of there houses and the animals would climb up trees from tallulah 10 years old
They would not survive.
how it would be different is because you need trees to have oxygen to survive and it helps with growing plants and if they did not have trees then they would die
how it would be different is because you need trees to have oxygen to survive and it helps with growing plants and if they did not have trees then they would die