there would not be a food chain
lion
There is an unestimated amount of hairs on a lion because every lion has a different number of hairs. If i were to estimate it it would probably be over a million.
From head to tail is 13-14 feet, depending how long the lion is without the tail. The average African lion is 9-10 feet without the tail. So, I would say 13-14 feet.
Tigers and lions inhabit different parts of the world, and the only contact they would have would be in captivity. Tigers are larger and more powerful, but not likely they would see each other as prey.
They are part of the ecosystem and are in a food chain: plants get eaten by sheep, lion then eat the sheep, without the lion there would be an overpopulation of sheep.
A lion would slaughter the eagle meaning kill it and the lion is the strongest land mammal in the world.
no i have a feeling they wouldn't....... seeing they live in completely different places so how could a bear even get close to a lion....
No. This is because they live in different parts of the world, so they never meet and so a lion cannot hunt jaguars. As they are both large cats, if they lived in the same part of the world they would be more likely to be rivals for some prey, rather than preying on each other.
Yes, without sight a lion could not hunt; therefore it would have no way of obtaining food and it would die or malnutrition. It would also be at risk from predators as it would not be able to see if it was about to be attacked.
The answer depends on where in the world the school is. In some locations there may be no difference.
Without weapons, it might be possible to kill a lion, but that might be hard to do. So it's possible to kill a lion without any weapons, but it's more likely for the lion to kill you when you don't have any weaons.
A lion is one of the most powerful animals in the world. If it were my life on the line I wouldn't even set foot in the bush without a 470 nitro or bigger.