How would you complete this analogy theory is to proof as promise is to?
It helped us by creating the theory of seafloor spreading which is the proof alfred needed to complete his hypothesis
Wolfram Pohlers has written: 'Proof theory' -- subject(s): Proof theory
A theory is scientific proof of what or why something happens
It is a scientific theory. There is no proof, and there is not likely to be any proof. As a theory, it is subjected to many tests, and the tests result in evidence supporting the theory or evidence refuting it. Over time, we will consider the theory either debunked or supported. However often a theory is supported by evidence, there is always the possibility that an unforeseen observation will be its undoing. That's why proof… Read More
The whole science of spectroscopy is proof of it.
Is there any proof of Egg mayonnaise?
Bruno Scarpellini has written: 'Proof theory and intuitionistic systems' -- subject(s): Intuitionistic mathematics, Proof theory
Mathematical logic and proof theory (a branch of mathematical logic) for proof
The proof of theory
to proof the research...
We can proof that newton wrong because some of his theory was proofed wrong.
Proof of it being wrong or another improved and better theory.
Theory has never been proved. So if a new fact or proof comes out for a theory, it can definitely be changed.
When they create theory. Then they search for the different proof for proving it. If they succeed then After confirmation the theory become law.
There is too much proof to tell you. From the double-slit experiment to Schwinger's equations.
Proof of a negative isn't possible. The lack of proof of its existence is not proof that something doesn't exist. So, until adequate proof of existence is accumulated, there will only be opinion, theory, and conjecture.
theory can only be a best simulation based on a formula. Fact is material proof
because of pangaea
Sometimes Yes, as in Pythagoras' Theorem. Other times No, for as Godel's Incompleteness Theorem shows, there will be complete bodies of knowledge in which there will be truths that cannot be proven, and falsities which cannot be denied. [I paraphrase his theorem.]
No. She is not a lesbian. Lady Gaga is. I have proof. I'm not vandalising or anything. Here is a website with proof: www.ladygaga/lesbianornot/ratings.com www.nickiminaj/kesha.com Here is my proof. You can go and see. I promise you I'm not lying.
One cannot have a theory (theorem) without proof. Theories are explanations (models with uses such as predicting on outcome of an experiment or event) for scientific laws, which only describe the phenomenon. Proof is anything that backs up a hypothesis. When a significant amount of proof is shown, the hypothesis becomes a theory due to it being accepting by the scientific community.
The purpose of the scientific theory is the proof of science and how the scientist were thinking before. Hope it helps =) H***On ;*
It all depends on the standard of "proof". For example if the standard of proof is there has not been found a contradiction, then the theory is absolutely correct until there is found a contradiction, for example the" sun will rise in the east". Another example: if the theory can be expressed mathematically, then mathematical standards of proof can be applied. The mathematical proof may be said to be absolute if it "perfectly" describes the… Read More
the proof is that the continents fit together as a puzzle and they were once joined as a super continent known as Pangaea and because of plate tectonics they drifted away, Go see the Continental drift theory
there might not be enough proof
Georges Dicker has written: 'Perceptual knowledge' -- subject- s -: Knowledge, Theory of, Perception - Philosophy -, Theory of Knowledge 'Descartes' -- subject- s -: First philosophy, God, Knowledge, Theory of, Methodology, Ontological Proof, Proof, Ontological, Theory of Knowledge 'Berkeley's idealism' -- subject- s -: Idealism, Idea - Philosophy -, Metaphysics
A Theory is just someones idea of what might work. Proof are what most people know will work
The model that has the Sun at the centre of the solar system is based on a knowledge of Kepler's 3 laws of planetary motion, backed up by precise calculations of the planets' orbits based on Newton's theory of gravity and the laws of motion. Galileo's telescopic observations were supportive of the theory. However, proof of the theory didn't come until later. The first proof of the heliocentric theory came in the 18th Century with… Read More
What are the ratings and certificates for The Big Bang Theory - 2007 The Tangible Affection Proof 6-16?
The Big Bang Theory - 2007 The Tangible Affection Proof 6-16 is rated/received certificates of: USA:TV-14
Louis Pasteur is the name of the French chemist who supplied proof for the theory of biogenesis. The theory in question observes that life comes from life by way of reproduction. Experiments by the French-born chemist and microbiologist in question (December 27, 1822 - September 28, 1895) still serve as refutation of the theory of spontaneous generation.
As there is proof to the Big Bang but not for God.
The main problem with Wegners theory of continental drift was that at the time he proposed it he had no real proof.
evolution is considered a theory and not a hypothesis or law because there is no real proof or evidence to prove evolution.
They didn't understand the Galileo's theory, because they thought the sun & planets revolved around the Earth. . Catholic Answer The Church had no problem with Galileo's theory, as a matter of fact, it was Copernicus who had previously put forward the theory and the Pope had congratulated him and given him a commendation. The Church had a problem with Galileo because he wanted to teach his theory as fact and not as theory. The… Read More
A theory is an idea system with a lot of evidence to support it--for example, the theory of evolution. A law (in science) is an idea system with proof attached to it--no contradictions--example, the law of gravitation.
I'm kinda sure that Newton's theory wasn't excepted because of the gravitational pull on the tides
proofs on earthquake activity theory
Because it takes theory to lead to answers. If no theory was proposed, then no search for definite proof and an answer would follow. Also, most everything dealing with science and psychology are based on theories.
The theory would have been possible, the proof would have been somewhat harder to get.
What is the proof for Darwin's theory of undirected mutation and incremental change over other theories of evolution - punctuated equilibrium?
Punctuated equilibrium is not ' a theory of evolution ' but well ensconced within modern evolutionary theory. Scientists look for evidence, not proof. The evidence suggests that punctuated equilibrium and incremental change are not mutually exclusive and both can occur in nature.
Stephen Hawking's is best known for the development of String Theory. He is also credited with providing a mathematical proof for the theory of Black Holes and Einstein's theory of Relativity. He redefined the Big Bang Theory and proved the universe does not have boundaries.
Galileo was not able to give conclusive proof of his theory when he was questioned on it. His theory seemed to contradict certain passages of Scripture that referred to the sun as ceasing to go around the earth at the command of Joshua. This verse was taken in a literal and scientific sense at the time and was not seen as just being written from the perspective of an observer. The Church condemned his teaching… Read More
A properly constituted agreement not to sue is called a 'quitclaim' and is perfectly legal. This assumes you bothered to get it written down and signed. If someone just said "I promise not to sue you", then the burden of proof is likely going to fall on you.
Because they didn't have any scientific proof that it wasn't correct.
all the answers are correct
Scientists have found much proof of dinosaurs like bones.
he had no proof how the continents drifted or what made them drift
Galileo was not told to recant his theory. He was told to stop teaching it as fact, especially because he had no proof that it was, indeed, fact.