hindi ko rin po alam kung ano ang sagot hehehehe tanong mo nalang sa pagong
It depends on how many species are in the ecosystem. if there is more species (kinds) then it is more diverese
The Tundra has the lowest biodiversity.
Biodiversity is the variation of life types within an environment. For instance, an environment with only a few different types of animals and plants would have a low instance of biodiversity.
A stagnant ecosystem refers to an ecosystem that lacks movement or change, often characterized by a lack of diversity, low productivity, and limited or no movement of energy and nutrients. Stagnant ecosystems typically have low levels of oxygen, causing a decrease in biodiversity and overall ecosystem health. Examples of stagnant ecosystems can include stagnant ponds or lakes with low water flow or oxygen levels.
|I would expect the smaller ecosystems to have a high species richness and smaller ecosystems to have low species richness because the biodiversity in the smaller ecosystem is actually larger than the larger ecosystem causing many problems in the atmosphere... which over time can cause a extinction towards many living organisms.
High
Bio (life) diversity (different unique individuals) low (quantity of). Low quantity of different life forms.
The Tundra has the lowest biodiversity.
Biodiversity is the variation of life types within an environment. For instance, an environment with only a few different types of animals and plants would have a low instance of biodiversity.
A banana plantation has low biodiversity.
Coral reefs have great genetic diversity, unparalleled and immense species diversity, and relatively low ecosystem diversity.
A stagnant ecosystem refers to an ecosystem that lacks movement or change, often characterized by a lack of diversity, low productivity, and limited or no movement of energy and nutrients. Stagnant ecosystems typically have low levels of oxygen, causing a decrease in biodiversity and overall ecosystem health. Examples of stagnant ecosystems can include stagnant ponds or lakes with low water flow or oxygen levels.
|I would expect the smaller ecosystems to have a high species richness and smaller ecosystems to have low species richness because the biodiversity in the smaller ecosystem is actually larger than the larger ecosystem causing many problems in the atmosphere... which over time can cause a extinction towards many living organisms.
low
Mountain tops and deserts have low biodiversity, especially in Antarctica.
Low biodiversity is referring to a limited amount of species in an area. In a low biodiversity, this means a single species will become extinct. There is also an interdependence amongst the species.
High
The sahara desert is very hot so not a lot of animals live there whereas, in a rain forest it rains a lot so lots of animals live there. So the answer is that a rain forest has a high biodiversity.
I believe a ecosystem with a high NPP would be better than one with a low NPP because than plants produce use full energy, but I am not positive if that is correct.