mobile
If an object has moved, I would say it has moved; there has been moment.
Logically, no co-ordinates were specified with the changed position so it would seem that the changed position has not moved.
Smaller than actual object and upright (right-side-up)
If one knows the POSITION and SPEED of an object at a given time, one can then predict the position of that object relative to the original POSITION at any time afterwards. Also useful to know would be the DIRECTION in which it was moving - which would enable a more accurate prediction of it's subsequent position; and any rate of ACCELERATION (or its negative, deceleration), i.e. the rate of change of speed, as this would also affect the object's subsequent position.
The "equations of motion" are statements that describe motion. They would not be of much use if the very thing they're used to describe caused them to change. I'll say they don't.
If an object has moved, I would say it has moved; there has been moment.
Logically, no co-ordinates were specified with the changed position so it would seem that the changed position has not moved.
Smaller than actual object and upright (right-side-up)
If one knows the POSITION and SPEED of an object at a given time, one can then predict the position of that object relative to the original POSITION at any time afterwards. Also useful to know would be the DIRECTION in which it was moving - which would enable a more accurate prediction of it's subsequent position; and any rate of ACCELERATION (or its negative, deceleration), i.e. the rate of change of speed, as this would also affect the object's subsequent position.
Not quite. Speed only measures how fast an object is moving, while velocity measures change in position relative to time. For example, an object that moves from point A to point B, and then back to it's original position, may move with speed, but since there is no change in position, velocity would be 0.
Circular motion would change the direction of an object but would not affect the object's speed.
The "equations of motion" are statements that describe motion. They would not be of much use if the very thing they're used to describe caused them to change. I'll say they don't.
No, this would be "displacement" or "motion." Speed is the non-directional scalar quantity (magnitude) for the rate of positional change.
There are many ways you could describe a typical weekday in a certain position. You could describe them as exciting or routine for example.
centrifugal and centripetal
You would call such an object opaque.
in uncategorized