you can describe it by
The energy that is not usefully transferred by solar cells is typically dissipated as heat. This occurs when the energy is not converted into electrical energy due to inefficiencies in the solar cell's conversion process.
solar energy would be a good alternitive energy
solar energy
Solar energy is from the sun not the earth.
Yes. It would be radiant to chemical energy because things(plants) would have to grow. Example: Sun to a tree The sun would be radiant and the tree would be chemical. No. A conversion between two types is not another type itself.
explain how earh would be different if it did not receive solar energy
The main consumers of solar energy would be human beings.
It would be eletrical to sound energy
A solar panel would be a good choice to demonstrate the conversion of light energy into heat energy. When sunlight hits the solar panels, they convert the light energy into electricity and heat, showcasing the transformation process.
If I had access to solar energy I would use more of it.
If solar energy were to run out, it would have catastrophic consequences for the planet, as solar power is a primary source of energy for many ecosystems and human activities. The loss of solar energy would disrupt photosynthesis, leading to the collapse of food chains and ecosystems. Additionally, human reliance on solar energy for electricity generation, heating, and transportation would necessitate a rapid shift to alternative energy sources, potentially causing energy shortages and economic instability. Overall, the depletion of solar energy would challenge the sustainability of life on Earth.
Technically eating an apple cannot be the first link in an energy conversion from solar power to X since the apple is already converted. Therefore your question is invalid. I would ask; do you mean what steps to convert the solar energy into an apple or to what energy is the stored and converted solar energy in the apple being converted to?