Explain that, to a scientist, the word "theory" does NOT mean "hunch" or "unsupported idea" -- the scientific word for that is "hypothesis." A "theory" is an over-arching idea that has passed rigorous, experimental tests. In scientific parlance, calling "the Big Bang" a "theory" is akin to calling a heliocentic solar system a "theory."
For many years, the ideas first proposed by Jesuit priest George LeMaitre -- now known as "the Big Bang" -- were simply hypotheses. His ideas, however, did make specific predictions about what results we would get if we did certain experiments. These experiments were first done fifty years ago, and the results were EXACTLY as predicted by Big Bang Cosmology. Since then, Big Bang Cosmology has continued to pass one scientific test after another, just like Copernicus' heliocentric model. That is why it has now been elevated to a "theory."
Note, of course, that there are people who despise science, and will not only misuse the word "theory," but make a concerted effort to spread this confusion to other people.
An arguer is a person who argues.
contrary
disputant
The person who argues with a fool is trying to convince someone who is unlikely to change their mind.
The present tense of "argue" is "argues" when referring to third-person singular pronouns (he, she, it) and "argue" for all other pronouns (I, you, we, they). For example, "He argues with his friend about politics." or "I argue for stricter gun control laws."
An argufier is a person who argufies - who argues with no particular aim.
An antievolutionist is a person who believes or argues that evolution does not take place.
the person is reverend hale.
The word "blind" is considered politically incorrect when used to describe a person with a visual impairment because it can be seen as defining the person solely by their disability. Instead, it is more appropriate to use person-first language, such as "person with a visual impairment," to emphasize the personhood of individuals.
Because it is exceptionally rude. It implies that nothing that that person could have to say is important to you.
Juliet famously declares, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." She argues that names are unimportant compared to the essence of a person or thing.
We are looking for leaders; explain to me why you are that person?