0
What else can I help you with?
Is an object in equilibrium moving?
An object in equilibrium is not moving, as all the forces acting on the object are balanced. If the object were to be in motion, it would no longer be in equilibrium as there would be an unbalanced force acting on it.
Why is an object in equilibrium during constant motion?
When an object is in equilibrium, the acceleration is zero. When the acceleration is zero, the velocity does not change; the non changing velocity includes the case when the velocity has value zero.
What is a force when neither object is moving?
When neither object is moving, the force between them is balanced. This is known as static equilibrium, where the forces acting on each object cancel each other out, resulting in no net force and no movement.
When is a body in equilibrium?
A body is refered to be in equilibrium when the forces acting on it cancel each other out, that is, the body has no resultant force. because F=ma , it can also be stated that a body is in equilibrium when there is no acceleration or deceleration in any direction. Therefore, if a body is moving at a steady speed, although it IS moving, it is still at equilibrium. We normally do not think of a moving object as one in equilibrium but that is because in an actual situation, air drag would cause an object to be in equilibrium with 0 velocity.
When the net forces on an object are not zero?
When the sum of the net forces on an object are not zero, it means that the object is being moved/pushed/pulled. It means that the object is not in equilibrium. If the net forces were zero, then the object would be in equilibrium, or, a state of not moving at all.
Why price ceiling and price floor is binding?
A price ceiling is binding when it is below the equilibrium price. It is the legal maximum price, so the market wants to reach equilibrium (which is above that) but can't legally. If it were above the equilibrium price it would not be binding because the market would reach equilibrium and the ceiling would have no effect. A price floor is binding when it is above the equilibrium price. You can use similar reasoning to that above. It is the legal minimum price. the market wants to reach equilibrium below that but can't legally.
How will you know that an object has kinetic?
The object would be moving.
What is the net force or the resultant force acting on an object in equilibrium?
0. An object in equilibrium has constant velocity, which makes its acceleration 0. Since net force=mass times acceleration, this would make the net force zero. Note that there could be multiple forces acting on the object, but since it is in equilibrium they would have to be equal and opposite in direction, to cancel all of the forces out. This would make the net force zero.
What if there is no friction would a a moving object stop moving?
If there is no friction, a moving object would continue moving at a constant velocity in a straight line unless acted upon by an external force. Without friction to oppose its motion, the object would not come to a stop on its own.
When you stretch out a spring at what point would you have the greatest potential energy?
A spring has maximum potential energy at maximum displacement from equilibrium. This means that the greatest potential energy will occur when a spring is stretched as far as it will stretch or compressed as tightly as it will compress. In an oscillating system, where an object attached to a spring is moving back and forth at a given frequency, the object will oscillate about the equilibrium point, and the potential energy of the system will be greatest (and equal) when the object is farthest from equilibrium on either side.
Explain what will happen if the gases were in different propagations?
If gases were in different propagations, they would diffuse and mix with each other to reach equilibrium. The faster moving gas particles would collide with the slower moving particles, eventually spreading out to fill the available space evenly. This would lead to a homogenous distribution of the gases.
Speculate how increasing the mass of a moving object would increase its velocity down the incline?
Increasing the mass of a moving object on an incline would increase its gravitational force. As a result, the object would accelerate more quickly and reach a higher velocity as it travels down the incline. This is because the increased mass would experience a greater force due to gravity, leading to a faster acceleration and ultimately a higher velocity.
