E.g. Bob asked an indirect question.
In the sentence, 'My aunt will give me a videotape.', the direct object is 'videotape', the indirect object is 'me'. will give -> videotape (to me)
Not exactly, but the subject of a passive sentence can be the indirect object of the equivalent active sentence--e.g. "Martha" in "Martha was given a rose by George" would be the indirect object in "George gave Martha a rose."
In the sentence "Your visit to the museum was educational", "visit" is the direct object. An indirect object would typically receive the direct object, such as in the sentence "I gave her a gift" where "her" is the indirect object receiving the direct object "gift".
He asked her to open the door.(indirect sentence) He asked her:"Please, open the door" (direct sentence)
She said that she wished she were rich.
Some plants do best in indirect sunlight.
Indirect means not direct. We got there by indirect means. The author used indirect characterization.
Some plants do best in indirect sunlight.
"They gave you a bonus" is the sentence which contains an indirect object.
Yes. In fact, a sentence must have a direct object in order to have an indirect object. (Note, however, that some consider the subject of a sentence in the passive voice to be an "implicit" indirect object, because it the sentence is changed to the active voice, the subject in the passive voice will often become an indirect object in the active voice.)
A direct or indirect object is a part of a sentence. A single word in isolation is neither a direct or indirect object. However, most nouns can be used in a sentence as either a direct or indirect object.
There can be as many indirectobjects as the are ways found to conjoin them in the sentence to which they would belong. So, for example, you might have: Bring me and her and those people over there chairs to sit on.