The sheer gumption of my worthy assistants saved my bacon today.
Yes; how about, "He's ridiculousuly rich; every assistant he has has their own assistants."
No, the sentence 'The researcher with all his assistants explain such claimed to be true' does NOT use correct grammar.Correct examples:The researcher with his assistants explained their claims to be true.The researcher and his assistants explained such claims to be true.Better:The researcher and his assistants defended their claims as true.OR, simplyThe researcher defended his claims.Note: "All of his assistants" isn't really needed because it is assumed most researchers have assistants. The assistants typically do not take public credit, or defend the claims, unless they were on the team of chief researchers or the assistants present the results on behalf of the researcher."As true" is not unnecessary if you use the verb defended.
Example sentence - We requested the assistants contact the executive branch for their lunch orders, which would be served during the meetings.
Not quite. The sentence is grammatically incorrect. If you want to convey that the researcher and his assistants explain a claim to be true, you could say something like "The researcher and his assistants together explain the claim to be true."
I would use it correctly in a sentence, of course. Thank you for asking.
Jarry use paroxysm in a sentence.\
I would use the word "theory" in a sentence like this: "The scientist presented a new theory to explain the findings of the experiment."
Would not that be "Would not that be?"?
You would use 'me' in this case. You use 'I' when you are the subject of the sentence, and 'me' when you are the object of the sentence or the phrase, as in this case.Subject of sentence: I was going to get a picture.Object of phrase: I was going to get a picture of Kaeleah and me.Object of sentence: It was Kaeleah andme in the picture.
How would you like me to put that in a sentence?
reassuring sentence
elan in a sentence