Can you please submerge the information until it becomes clear what happened.
I will submerge the toy submarine in water when I have assembled all its parts.
The torpedos were fired from the submerged submarine.
the water submerged all the way to his neck
I would say so!
The word submerged means it was under water instead of above the water.
I would use it correctly in a sentence, of course. Thank you for asking.
It would only be redundant if the context had already made it unambiguous that it was water. It is possible to be submerged under any liquid: for example french fries are cooked submerged under hot oil (they can't be cooked submerged under hot water).Yes, "submerged underwater" is redundant. Submerged under anything is redundant since the prefix "sub-" means "under." In most cases, the use of "submerged" alone is sufficient. In case there is some question about the substance something is submerged in (not necessarily liquid, not necessarily tangible), you might occasionally have use for "submerged in water."
Jarry use paroxysm in a sentence.\
I would use the word "theory" in a sentence like this: "The scientist presented a new theory to explain the findings of the experiment."
Would not that be "Would not that be?"?
You would use 'me' in this case. You use 'I' when you are the subject of the sentence, and 'me' when you are the object of the sentence or the phrase, as in this case.Subject of sentence: I was going to get a picture.Object of phrase: I was going to get a picture of Kaeleah and me.Object of sentence: It was Kaeleah andme in the picture.
How would you like me to put that in a sentence?
reassuring sentence