contantly moving from place to place. moving to where there are more plant and animals
The development of agriculture and the domestication of plants and animals brought changes to the hunter-gatherer way of life. This allowed for settled lifestyles, surplus food production, and the establishment of permanent settlements.
Humans in the Stone Age lived a life that was basically nomadic and hunter gatherer.
Nomadic lifestyle - Hunter-gatherer societies move frequently in search of food and resources. Adaptability - They rely on their knowledge of the environment to adapt to different conditions and seasons. Small, egalitarian groups - Typically, hunter-gatherer societies live in small bands where decision-making is often shared among community members.
Pros of being a hunter-gatherer include a close connection to nature, self-sufficiency, and a simpler way of life. However, cons may include a lack of access to modern amenities, potential food scarcity, and susceptibility to environmental challenges.
Life expectancy in early cities was shorter than among nomadic hunter-gatherer peoples due to higher population densities in cities leading to increased spread of disease, poor sanitation, limited access to diverse food sources, and greater exposure to pollution and environmental hazards. Nomadic hunter-gatherer societies had a more varied diet, lower disease transmission rates, and fewer environmental stressors, contributing to longer life expectancy.
Hunter-gatherer societies lived in small groups, usually nomadic, and relied on hunting animals and gathering wild plants for their food. They had a deep connection to the natural world and lived in harmony with their environment. Their social structure was typically egalitarian, with no formal leaders or hierarchies.
The !Kung people of the Kalahari Desert in Africa are an example of hunter-gatherers. They rely on hunting and gathering wild plants for their sustenance and have adapted to life in a harsh environment over thousands of years.
You could explain that civilization offers a more stable and secure way of life, with access to resources, technology, and infrastructure that can improve living conditions. Emphasize the benefits of community cooperation, culture, and knowledge development that come with civilization, compared to the challenges and uncertainties of the hunter-gatherer lifestyle.
a hunting and gathering society is a group of men and women. women were like stay at home moms today except that they gather small things like grains, berries, and other fruits. they took care of the kids. the fathers and men hunted animals like sheep, cow, and wolfs. every now and then the fathers took the boys out to teach them how to hunt so that they can be strong when they grow up.
Hunter-gatherer societies were highly dependent on the natural environment for their survival, as they relied on hunting animals and gathering food from nature. Their way of life required a deep understanding and respect for the environment they lived in, as they needed to know where to find food sources, water, and shelter. Their lifestyle was generally sustainable and in harmony with the natural world.
Hunter-gatherer societies were nomadic because they relied on wild resources for food, which were spread out and required moving to different locations to gather. This lifestyle allowed them to follow the seasonal availability of plants and animals, and prevented overexploitation of resources in one area.
Some of the challenges and drawbacks of being a hunter-gatherer include: Insecurity of food supply: Hunter-gatherers relied on the unpredictability of hunting and gathering, which at times resulted in periods of hunger and food scarcity. Nomadic lifestyle: Hunter-gatherer groups were often mobile, following animal herds and seasonal resources. This required constant movement and limited the establishment of permanent settlements. Lack of technological advancements: Without advanced tools and technology, tasks such as farming, building permanent structures, and food preservation were difficult or impossible to accomplish, imposing limitations on their quality of life.