Unless you can demonstrate that the first dentist was somehow negligent or incompetent, no, you should not expect a rebate. Root canal therapy is not guaranteed. These procedures can and do fail through no one's fault.
As of September 2021, NASA has had over 200 missions, with some resulting in partial or complete failure. However, the exact number of failed missions can vary depending on how failure is defined (e.g., partial failure, complete failure, etc.).
Only a dentist can answer this one and I suggest you find a better dentist. Many people don't realize you can have up to 4 diffent canals in a tooth and not the usual two. Some dentists are sloppy and miss this.
They failed because they were killed by the Philippine's president.
The correct grammar can be written as such: * He was careless; thus, he failed the test. * He failed the test because he was careless. * Because he was careless, he failed the test. * Since he was careless, he failed the test. * He failed the test since he was careless. * He failed the test, for he was careless. * He was careless. He failed the test. * He failed the test. He was careless.
Call the dentist that did your root canal or any current dentist. When the nerve dies the tooth turns grey. Then the tooth has to be pulled. Depending on where your 'root canal' is, you may need a bridge or implant. This was my experience. Cost would depend on the dentist fee and insurance consideration. Blessings.
it could, the root canal treatment may have failed. ________________________________ Yes, this is possible and it sounds as though the tooth is infected or cracked. You should consult with your dentist. -Thornhill Dentist www.bcdentalcare.ca
Because the rebellion failed.
Never, because capitalism has not failed.
The Oneida Community failed because of financial mishandling. It could count as a failed communal system.
It's not because he failed its because other citizen did'ent really got inspire by his speech
Opel and Daewoo had failed India because of sales
Partial inspiration is a phrase used in biblical studies. It states that although God did inspire parts of Scripture, he failed to identify the part which was inspired.