It is a civil matter. I don't know if your auto insurance covers things like that. But, it can't be too much damage. You'd be better off having her get 2 or 3 professional damage estimates and coming to an agreement on what you owe her for the damage. Be sure she signs off on whatever payment you make to her so you CYA and she can't come back on you. If you decide to work with her on this, I'd take a picture of the damage you KNOW you are responsible for...do it right away. You don't want the repairs to cover some other damage than yours. If you think it's minor enough and know a body guy that can look at it for you, maybe it's something that can just be buffed out.
Bottom line. Take responsibility. That's doing the right thing. Just don't get taken in the process!
This would be a civil matter. The most likely outcome, if any, would be that you pay to fix whatever damage is done.
Trespassing is a crime, which means it is a criminal matter. It is not a civil matter.
Corruption civil matter
This is a civil matter.
Copyright law is a civil matter. But sometimes it can stray into criminal law, if for example you download a movie illegally that is a civil matter, but if you then sell copies of that movie it is criminal. To clarify, in the UK it is not illegal to buy 'pirate' DVDs but it is illegal to sell them.
No. Outstanding debt is a civil matter, not criminal. You can not be arrested for a civil matter.
No. It is a criminal matter and should be reported to the police.
A criminal subpoena is an official notice to appear, issued by the court, regarding a criminal (as opposed to civil) matter.
No, it is a criminal matter. Civil suits are for disputes between two private parties, like contracts or property damage.
Haven't seen the movie, but I suspect that the answer is in the title. no
It's a misdemeanor I think. I would believe it would be a criminal offense
It is a civil issue, unless it involved assault or other criminal activity.
If there are, in fact, both a criminal and a civil side to the incident, the criminal aspect will be handled first. The "state's" (i.e.: the "people's") interests in prosecuting a crime take precedence over the civil wrong against an individual. (Think the O.J. Simpson case.) Traditionally, the criminal matter will be decided first. This is primarily because proceeding with the civil case can prejudice a criminal defendant's rights. The civil case will wind up stalled because the criminal defendant can refuse to comply with civil discovery by asserting the right to remain silent. Admissions or statements given in a civil case could be employed against the criminal defendant. As a practical matter the civil case cannot proceed until there is a resolution of the criminal matter. For further information see the related links below.