When you read sentence fragments, they are missing (in some combination):
I walked. Technically, it is a complete sentence. It has a subject and a verb. But it doesn't tell us much.
I walked home. A better complete sentence. It has subject, verb and a modifier that indicates where.
If you wrote:
At the Baseball game, he -- You would have a pronoun subject, but no verb.
At the baseball game, he yelled. -- It has a pronoun, subject, and technically could be a complete sentence. But it doesn't give much information.
At the baseball game, he yelled until he lost his voice. -- This gives much more information. It answers subject (he) verb (lost) what/object (his voice) and the modifying clause of where (at the baseball game).
It is a subordinate clause
It lacks a complete verb.
It is a subordinate clause.
Fused sentence- apex, your welcome say thank you
Supplying a noun is one way to fix the problem.
Supplying a noun is one way to fix the problem.
rewrite it to make it a complete sentence answer to the apex question :)
When you read sentence fragments, they are missing (in some combination):Who or What - the subjectDid what - the verbTo whom or to What - the object.I walked. Technically, it is a complete sentence. It has a subject and a verb. But it doesn't tell us much.I walked home. A better complete sentence. It has subject, verb and a modifier that indicates where.If you wrote:At the baseball game, he -- You would have a pronoun subject, but no verb.At the baseball game, he yelled. -- It has a pronoun, subject, and technically could be a complete sentence. But it doesn't give much information.At the baseball game, he yelled until he lost his voice. -- This gives much more information. It answers subject (he) verb (lost) what/object (his voice) and the modifying clause of where (at the baseball game).
never knowing what is really going on
The simple verb in the sentence is "manages."
Dangling Modifier
Dangling Participle