If God made the world who made evolution?

Answer 1

Answer

The answer is Man. This is because evolution is man's attempt to answer questions about creation and origins without reference to God the Creator by instead making a god and calling it Evolution ( sometimes called 'Nature'.)

To help understand this, there are two forms of evolution: Micro-evolution and Macro-evolution. Micro-evolution refers to small changes in a creature, or inter-speciel changes, while macro-evolution refers to giant changes from one creature into another, or intra-speciel changes.

An example of micro-evolution are seen in cats, with their fur growing longer and thicker for cold climates, and thinner for hot climates: this can be seen in the hairy Persian cat and the hairless Egyptian cat. Micro-evolution undoubtedly occurs.

Macro-evolution is the supposed change of one species into another different species altogether eg monkeys to man, fish to mammals etc. Examples of macro-evolution are not seen, except in the imagination of man attempting to explain how things came about without God.

Since macro-evolution is the transformation of one species into another completely different one, you would expect there to be transitional stages on the way: no transitional species have ever been found to support the idea of macro-evolution. Micro-evolution does occur in species and is true and valid, but it is usually then used to, quite falsely, 'prove' that macro-evolution must occur. Macro-evolution is only a concept, an idea, a process which is unproven and unprovable: it is not the means of the formation of matter in the first place. The question of origins is one evolutionists refuse to honestly face: it is hypocritical of them to to say on the one hand that scientists are right when they talk about origins, which is properly a theological matter, and then to say that religious people can't talk about science because they will be wrong. The question of origins is wholly theological and not scientific , and this also makes theistic evolution just another attempt to explain away creation by having a bet each way.

Answer:

We humans create things in accordance to our intelligence. As our intelligence improve so are our creations. We restructure our old creations. We term it evolution. If God created the world, would He not improve it? God created all things to grow, develop and become better. He did not create them to be stagnant. That process of becoming better is called evolution. Evolution is still a part of creation. If we deny creation, we deny every human birth. If we deny evolution, we do not have the right to become better. If we separate the two then we have not really learned anything.

Answer:

I do believe that evolution is very possible, but not to the extent that so many believe. It is common sense that if a random genetic mutation occurs which helps an animal to survive, that this trait would be passed on because the organism would be able to survive longer and therefore reproduce more. But, I do believe that life was set in motion by God.

Answer 2

This question requires an assumption that God made the world. But many (atheists and followers of non-Abrahamic religions) do not believe that God made the world. However, if God did make the world, he could have chosen to use evolution as the means of creation. This is called "theistic evolution" and appears to be the explanation preferred by the Catholic Church and the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury, among others.

For a more detailed explanation,please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation

Answer 3

The religious view is that Evolution is a human invention, most often used as a smokescreen to hide God. Some others hold that God guided evolution.See also the Related Links.

Is there evidence against Evolution

Can you show that God exists