answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

That is what alot of people wanted to know. And there is an explaination for her clean clothes. Within hours after the murders Lizzy's sister Emma caught Lizzy stuffing one of her dresses into the wood-burning stove. When Emma asked her why she would want to burn her dress Lizzy answered that she got red paint on it. Sure enough, the dress had red stains all over it. I would imagine that at this point, Emma may have begun to wonder about her sister's role in the death of her father and stepmother.

There have been theories about how she could have committed such grusome murders without getting blood all over her. There was the rumor that Lizzy hacked her parents while wearing nothing at all. This I find hard to believe. The murders were committed in the year 1892 in a small town. Victorian era people were modest in the extreme. I sincerely doubt that Lizzy would have wanted to appear nude in front of her own father. At the very least he would have cried out at the sight of his naked daughter and it could have been heard by the cleaning girl that was upstairs taking a rest from the heat of the day. I believe she burned the evidence and her sister Emma caught her in the act.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: If Lizzie Borden did kill her parents why was she not covered in blood?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was missing from the Lizzie Borden case?

Jennings was refering to a lack of phyisical evidence against his client Lizzie Borden. The broken hatchett could not be absolutely determined to be the murder weapon. Lizzie's lack of blood on her person should exonorate her, theory being that the killer would have had to have been covered in blood. Jennings declared that Lizzie had no motive to murder her parents. These were the most important points made by the defense.


Where is the murder weapon used in the Lizzie Borden case?

The hatchet that was used to kill the Bordens is now in the Lizzy Borden museum in Fall River, MA. It was found in the celler of the Borden's house with traces of blood and a broken handle.


How old was Lizzie borden when her parents were killed?

Lizzie Borden was born on July 19, 1860


How was it thought that Lizzie Borden axed 2 people to death and got no blood on herself?

It is possible that Lizzie completely disrobed before she attacked her parents, which would have prevented any blood on her clothes, and then hurriedly bathed to remove the blood from her skin and hair. //The theory that Lizzie attacked her step-mother and father while in the nude is highly improbable. The Victorian era, at least in America, was a time period that was extremely prudish, the 'sex' word was taboo in and of itself. Lizzie was a well brought up lady, and would have thought it scandalous to show a little ankle. Women did not menstrate, they refered to it as a 'flea bite'. It is completely absurd that Lizzie would approach her father without benefit of clothing. Nor would she have disrobed in front of her step-mother. The explaination of no blood evidence was revealed shortly after the murders. Alice Russell, friend of Lizzie and Emma Borden, stayed with the sisters in the house on 2nd street. According to Alice, Lizzie burned a dress in the kitchen's woodstove, claiming she got paint on it. This is also unlikely. Any clothing ruined would have been cut up and used as rags, nothing going to waste.


What was the explanation for the time between the Borden's murders?

The only viable explaination is that the killer remained in the home between the two murders, because the killer was Lizzie herself. ------ The story of the Borden murders was so horrifying that it was, in its time, given the media equivalent of modern trials like the OJ Simpson case, and the Rosenberg spy trial. It has gone down in history thanks to the children's rhyme that was invented at the time of the case. Virtually every child has heard of Lizzie Borden and knows what she did - she murdered her mother and father by hitting them 40 and 41 times with an axe. But did she? The Myth: Lizzie Did the Deed Lizzie Borden took an axe and gave her mother forty whacks. When she saw what she had done she gave her father forty-one. - Popular Rhyme The short answer to the question posed in the introduction is "no" - Lizzie Borden did not kill her father (Andrew) and step-mother (Abby). Also untrue is the number of blows each received from the famous axe used to kill them. Her father was hit 11 times and her stepmother 18 or 19 times. Lizzie was seen minutes after the murders and had no blood on her at all. Furthermore, a month previous, a man had committed axe murders very similar in style to the Borden killings. He claimed to have been outside of the country when Andrew and Abby were killed but it seems too much a coincidence to make his story believable. The Trial Lizzie was put on trial for the murder but after only one hour of jury deliberations she was found innocent. No one else was ever tried for the murders and Lizzie went on to live a relatively peaceful life and died 35 years after the famous case. She left $30,000 to an animal welfare league and the remainder of her estate (which was quite large for the time) was left to a friend and cousin. You can stay in the house where the Bordens were killed as it is now a bed and breakfast and the home that Lizzie lived in after the murders until her death offers tours (by appointment only). Some circumstantial evidence does seem to suggest that Lizzie may have killed her parents, but no evidence was ever given to prove it. While her clothing had no blood on it, she did burn a dress after the killings because she said it had paint on it. She also tried to purchase poison a week before the murders and the entire household became very sick the day before - this was put down to food poisoning. At the time, forensics were not as trusted as today and so the axe was not fingerprinted even though the technology to do so existed at the time and could have given proof that Lizzie was innocent (or guilty) Interesting Fact: Lizzie Borden and actress Elizabeth Montgomery (of Bewitched fame), who coincidentally portrayed Lizzie in a television movie about the murders and trial, were sixth cousins once removed. Both women descended from 17th century Massachusetts resident John Luther. Rhonda McClure, the genealogist who documented the Montgomery-Borden connection, said, "I wonder how Elizabeth would have felt if she knew she was playing her own cousin." by Jamie Frater


Can history come with the real Lizzie Borden?

The story of the Borden murders was so horrifying that it was, in its time, given the media equivalent of modern trials like the OJ Simpson case, and the Rosenberg spy trial. It has gone down in history thanks to the children's rhyme that was invented at the time of the case. Virtually every child has heard of Lizzie Borden and knows what she did - she murdered her mother and father by hitting them 40 and 41 times with an axe. But did she? The Myth: Lizzie Did the Deed Lizzie Borden took an axe and gave her mother forty whacks. When she saw what she had done she gave her father forty-one. - Popular Rhyme The short answer to the question posed in the introduction is "no" - Lizzie Borden did not kill her father (Andrew) and step-mother (Abby). Also untrue is the number of blows each received from the famous axe used to kill them. Her father was hit 11 times and her stepmother 18 or 19 times. Lizzie was seen minutes after the murders and had no blood on her at all. Furthermore, a month previous, a man had committed axe murders very similar in style to the Borden killings. He claimed to have been outside of the country when Andrew and Abby were killed but it seems too much a coincidence to make his story believable. The Trial Lizzie was put on trial for the murder but after only one hour of jury deliberations she was found innocent. No one else was ever tried for the murders and Lizzie went on to live a relatively peaceful life and died 35 years after the famous case. She left $30,000 to an animal welfare league and the remainder of her estate (which was quite large for the time) was left to a friend and cousin. You can stay in the house where the Bordens were killed as it is now a bed and breakfast and the home that Lizzie lived in after the murders until her death offers tours (by appointment only). Some circumstantial evidence does seem to suggest that Lizzie may have killed her parents, but no evidence was ever given to prove it. While her clothing had no blood on it, she did burn a dress after the killings because she said it had paint on it. She also tried to purchase poison a week before the murders and the entire household became very sick the day before - this was put down to food poisoning. At the time, forensics were not as trusted as today and so the axe was not fingerprinted even though the technology to do so existed at the time and could have given proof that Lizzie was innocent (or guilty) Interesting Fact: Lizzie Borden and actress Elizabeth Montgomery (of Bewitched fame), who coincidentally portrayed Lizzie in a television movie about the murders and trial, were sixth cousins once removed. Both women descended from 17th century Massachusetts resident John Luther. Rhonda McClure, the genealogist who documented the Montgomery-Borden connection, said, "I wonder how Elizabeth would have felt if she knew she was playing her own cousin." by Jamie Frater


Why did Lizzy Borden kill her parents?

Proof she did: She burned a bloody blue dress and she was wearing a blue dress the day of murders She kept on asking Bridget(The maid) if she was going out the day on the murders She and the maid were the only two people in the house When the judge asked her the same question which was: where were you when your father came home? she changed her answer at least 10 times She didn't like her stepmother and had recently had an argument with her dad The night before the murders, she went to a neighboor and said: she thought some enemy of the dad was going to kill him soon She tried to buy poison from a Pharmacy a few days before the murder The police found no evidence of someone breaking in and killing them She didnt notice the body of her father until the minute he got killed There is a lot more proof than this My theory: A day before the murders, Lizzie Borden tried to buy a type of deadly poisoning, maybe she tried to poison her parents first, but she didnt get to buy it. So instead, She got an ax thing and whacked her parents with it. On that day, a neighboor saw her burning a bloody blue dress, which she was wearing a blue dress on the day of the murders. After she killed the parents, she changed her clothes and burned the dress. But in the trial, she denied it was blood and said it was red paint!? But after all that, how did Lizzie and Bridget not see the bodies? All the doors were wide open exept the front door. MY other theory was that Bridget and Lizzie were both into the plan! No one will ever know...


What was the evidence in the Lizzie Borden case?

Much of the evidence in the Borden case was circumstantial. The broken and possibly bloody hatchet found in the cellar could not be proven to actually be the murder weapon. The story was either rust or chicken blood. Science was not advanced enough at the time to distinguish human from animal blood. No bloody clothes were found. The Borden's friend Alice Russell observed Lizzie burning a dress in the kitchen's woodstove the day after the murders. What it came down to was, Lizzie was about the only one that had the motive and the opportunity to kill Andrew and Abbey Borden. Bridget Sullivan, the Borden's maid, was sick that day and after washing windows retired to her attic room to lay down for a much needed nap. Lizzie's uncle John Morse, a house guest at the time of the murders was away attending to business with witnesses to verify his whereabouts. Emma Borden, Lizzie's older sister was out of town visiting friends. Once the victims are eliminated, for obvious reasons, the remaining person was Lizzie.


Did Lizzie borden ever go to jail?

Lizzie never married. A couple of biographys written about her life proclaim that she was gay. There is some evidence that supports this theory. The fact that Lizzie had a relationship with a New York stage actress named Nance O'Neil is well documented. Harder to prove is that it was a sexual relationship. It was at this time though that Emma, Lizzie's older sister, moved out of the house they shared, after some kind of disagreement. It was serious enough that the sisters never reconciled.


Why did Lizzie Borden murder her parents?

Lizzie Borden was accused of murdering her parents, Andrew and Abby Borden, in 1892. The true motive for the murders has never been definitively proven, but theories suggest financial gain, strained family relationships, or mental health issues as potential factors. Lizzie Borden was acquitted at trial due to lack of evidence.


Did Lizzie Borden kill her family?

Lizzie Borden died from pneumonia on June 1, 1927 in Fall River, Massachusetts.


What did Miss Russell testify to seeing Lizzie Borden burn?

In the first days after the double murders, Alice Russell, being friends to both Emma and Lizzie, stayed with them in the house at 92 2nd St. The day after the murders Alice saw Lizzie cutting, ripping, and burning a dress and stuffing the pieces in the woodstove. Asking Lizzie why she was destroying the dress Lizzie claimed to have brushed up against wet paint and that the dress was ruined. Needless to say, Russell made a strong witness for the prosecution. This seemingly beniegn act answers the question of Lizzie's lack of blood on her clothes. It is highly suspect and it's hard to believe the jurors gave this piece of circumstantial evidence so little weight in their deliberations. It is also hard to believe that a paint-stained garmet would end up in the fire. In the 19th century, few things were wasted. Old clothing and cloth were recycled, either as braiding for rag rugs for the floors, or cleaning rags and even toilet rags before the widespread use of toilet paper. In the Borden household, Andrew Borden ran a tight ship and frowned on any kind of waste. It would have been an uncharacteristic and unlikely scenario.