The short answer is YES. I would get a DNA test to be sure, but women sometimes do this as college is approaching and it really screws up the guy and sometimes they have to declare bankruptcy. I've seen claims of up to $200,000. Individual state limits run from 2 to 18 years retroactive, but a growing number of judges are denying the motions. Judge David Grey Ross, Commissioner of the Federal Office of Child Support Enforcement opposed the practice. see links
Until/unless you are determined to be the child's father, no.
The same as any single father, none until order them by the courts, but they can still be held liable for retroactive child support. see related links
If it's like Illinois, the mother's husband is presumed to be the child's father unless/until proven otherwise. If someone else is proven to be the father, he will be potentially liable for child support.
yes - If someone asks for the support and he is the father.
Yes. Up until that moment the child is yours along with the responsibilities.
Depends on your state laws and what your child support agreement says but you have to pay at least until the child is 18.
When you relinquish your parental rights so the child can be adopted you are no longer responsible for paying child support. You are liable for support until/unless child is adopted.
Only if the child has a severe disability.
No, child support does not start until the child is born. Once the child is born the mother can seek child support and it can be deducted from the father's pay.
Although a father has a moral obligation to support his child he is not legally responsible for payment until there has been a support order issued by the court.
My answer to that would be 'No'. The father is responsible for providing child-support regardless of who has custody of the child; at least until the age of 18.
Yes. If paternity has been established the father will be required to pay child support until the child is at least eighteen.