Aristotle believed that friendships based on pleasure are not as strong or lasting as those based on virtue. He thought that friendships rooted in pleasure are often superficial and can easily dissolve when the pleasure fades.
Aristotle believed that true friendship is based on mutual respect, virtue, and shared values. He taught that there are three types of friendships: friendships of utility, friendships of pleasure, and friendships of the good. Aristotle believed that the highest form of friendship is the friendship of the good, where both friends are virtuous and seek the well-being of the other person for their own sake.
Socrates and Alcibiades demonstrate different types of friendship described by Aristotle in Nicomachean Ethics. Socrates embodies perfect friendship based on virtue, where both friends strive for the other's moral and intellectual growth. Alcibiades, on the other hand, represents imperfect friendship driven by utility and pleasure, as seen in his manipulative relationship with Socrates. Aristotle uses these examples to illustrate the complexities and nuances of friendship.
The correct wording is based on the context of the statement, for example:I have the pleasure of advising our loyal customers... (continuous, ongoing)I have the pleasure to advise you... (here and now, by this message)
yrosifymlisue
Friendship should be based on respect, honesty, and trust. Those are the key roles of relationship.
Derrida believed that true friendship is based on openness, vulnerability, and the acceptance of differences. He challenged traditional notions of friendship that are based on similarity, stability, and mutual benefit. Derrida emphasized the importance of embracing the unknown and the other in friendship, rather than seeking comfort in familiarity and sameness.
An antiutilitarian is a person who opposes utilitarianism, a system of ethics based on the premise that something's value may be measured by its usefulness.
These are: * Friendship with good people. * Friendships based on Utility. * Frienships based on Pleasure.Aristotle considered only friendships of good people to be complete, as the other two variants are based on circumstance.
In all honesty you can't. It either, take a leap of faith and risk the friendship, or stay content with the friendship. The main reason you two are probably close friends is because you are long for a sense of intimacy, which soon you will realize you can't have it and move on. So either way, it's inevitable that the friendship will head down hill if the friendship is based on a longing sense of intimacy. Why not take the leap of faith then ? But, what you can do is devise a subtle way of finding out. For example spend alot of personally time with him and very very subtly flirt with him. Find a reason to be "scared" and hold onto him and look at everyone of his reactions and analyze his feelings.
The Id.
being buddy buddy and doing things based on friendship or affiliations