1 change the hypothesis to meet the facts
2. ignore the facts and loudly condemn anyone who disagrees with you
The incorrect hypothesis may be discarded, or it can be modified until it is consistent with all the data that has been collected.
This indicates that the hypothesis is probably incorrect and a new hypothesis needs to be developed. A negative result for a scientific experiment is just as important as a positive result and means that the experiment was a success.
Do the experiment again and again to confirm the data is correct If the data is consistent then your hypothesis is wrong and you need to think of a new one that fits the data.
whenever an experiment fails to confirm the theory it is no longer a theory ... it becomes a hypothesis
whenever an experiment fails to confirm the theory it is no longer a theory ... it becomes a hypothesis
whenever an experiment fails to confirm the theory it is no longer a theory ... it becomes a hypothesis
The scientist or student scientist should review the results. Conclusions should be drawn based on the results. Then, the hypothesis is reviewed to make sure the results confirm the hypothesis; if not, revise the hypothesis and rerun the experiment.
This experiment is being conducted to test a specific hypothesis or research question, to gather data and analyze results for scientific inquiry, and to contribute to the understanding of a particular phenomenon or field of study.
His hypothosis that longterm unemployment contributes to illness was proven after years of painstaking research and personal interviews. My hypothesis for this experiment is that it will turn out successful because it has been done before.
The significant hypothesis is the one that you will be able to confirm.
A testable hypothesis is a specific statement that proposes a relationship between variables or predicts an outcome that can be empirically tested through research or experimentation. It is formulated in a way that allows for observations or data to confirm or refute the hypothesis.
It depends a great deal on the specific experiment. But in general, you start with a hypothesis (a proposed idea) and use the experiment to either confirm or contradict your hypothesis. Having a well-stated and clear hypothesis is critical to having a good experiment. Alternatively, you can use an experiment to answer a specific question. Once you have a hypothesis or question to address, you need to establish a method by which you will answer the question. It is important to not only consider the technique itself and how to do it, but also how to interpret different possible results. Once you have performed the experiment, you must interpret your results (usually using the interpretation mentioned above). You must also consider other factors in your results, such as error (either random or systematic). Finally, do the results support or contradict the original hypothesis, or do they answer the question originally asked? If not, what is missing? If so, what does that mean (in other words, why was the hypothesis interesting or important to test in the first place?