answersLogoWhite

0

In the US - Individual citizens do not have the power to "charge" anyone with a crime. They can only "accuse" someone of an offense. Law enforcement is responsible for investigating the accusation and, if sufficient probable cause is found to exist, THEY will 'charge' the accused with the appropriate offense. The case will then be presented to the prosecutor's office, and if the charge appears sustainable, the accused will be bound over for trial. If he is found not guilty at trial, unless the prosecution appeals the verdict, that is the end of it.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What did Michael Jackson do to get less popular?

somebody accused him of child molestation that proved to not be true in the end but alot of people turned against him and stuff. look him up on wikipedia xD


What are the common justifications for Iraq invasion and foreseen Syria invasion?

The common justification is having weapons of mass destruction. Iraq was accused of having nuclear weapons that proved later to not true. Syria was accused of using chemical weapons against Syrian people although the inspection team have not yet proved whether the chemical weapons used by the government or by the opposition.


If a man has accused another of laying a nertu death spell upon him but has not proved it he shall be put to death 2 If a man has accused another of laying a kispu spell upon him but has?

no


Who proved the existence of a positively charged nucleus by his experiment with gold foil?

Ernest Rutherford


Rutherford propose center of the atom was negatively charged nucleus?

true but his experiment proved him wrong :)


How did TV help break the power of Joseph McCarthy?

It proved to the world how crazy his allegations were when he accused so many innocent Americans of communism.


How can the rights of the accused be just to the victim?

Rights of the accused have nothing to do with being just or unjust to the victim since, using the U.S. justice system as the example, the accused is innocent until proven guilty. In practice and in reality, this can actually be very unjust to a victim, depending on the crime, as the victim had their rights stripped of them by whoever committed a crime against them yet the accused has a myriad of rights to protect them and the process of proving guilt can be further insult to injury to the victim. When guilt is proved beyond a reasonable doubt, the victim is supposed to feel like justice was served. Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't.


How can rights of the accused be just to the victim?

Rights of the accused have nothing to do with being just or unjust to the victim since, using the U.S. justice system as the example, the accused is innocent until proven guilty. In practice and in reality, this can actually be very unjust to a victim, depending on the crime, as the victim had their rights stripped of them by whoever committed a crime against them yet the accused has a myriad of rights to protect them and the process of proving guilt can be further insult to injury to the victim. When guilt is proved beyond a reasonable doubt, the victim is supposed to feel like justice was served. Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't.


What is the first law promulgated by hammurabi?

1. If a man has accused another of laying a nertu [death spell?] upon him, but has not proved it, he shall be put to death.


How were witches accused?

If you made somebody angry or you were an oddball or sometimes you may not even know how it happened. Once the hysteria began it was every 'man' for himself. Unforturnately, the very device that proved a person innocent was also the device that killed the accused.


What is bads about the great wall?

It was expensive to build, and it proved to be ineffective against invaders.


A man accused of crime in court has a right to what?

The right to remain silent, which is proved through the US Supreme Court Case Miranda v. Arizona. He has the right to an attorney. He has the right to a jury of his peers.