Effective representation and a trial by jury.
Represent himself. Tho I wouldn't recommend it.
The accused has the right to confront witnesses against him. There have been some exceptions, such as when children of very young ages are to testify against their adult rapist/molester. One should check with a local attorney for details specific to their situation.
In the US, someone accused of a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Under the Bill of Rights in the US Constitution, he is entitled to reasonable bail (if eligible), a right to counsel, a trial by a jury of his peers, and to be confronted with the witnesses against him. The accused cannot be forced to incriminate himself or to testify against himself.
The first thing the Romans did with someone accused of a crime was to give him a trial. Where this trial took place depended on the status of the accused and the type of crime. A petty crime by someone of the lower class would be tried by one of the praetors and if found guilty the man would be fined and set free. A capital crime, such as murder had special courts and if the man were found guilty he could face the death penalty, again depending upon the status of the person he murdered and the circumstances of the crime. However, a man accused of treason or a public official accused of corruption, both of these defendants, usually being of a high status, would be tried before the Senate.
donno wat it is man
Bloom and Politan Open Court - 2006 Man Accused of Killing Ex-Lover's Husband was released on: USA: 4 August 2008
William Henry Blore is a character in Agatha Christie's novel "And Then There Were None". He is a retired police inspector accused of having an innocent man convicted and sentenced to life as a scapegoat. Blore takes a bribe to secure the man's conviction. His victim dies in prsion.
They say he is a bootlegger and that he's killed a man
The idea that no man can be put in prison unless by order of a Court of Law after a fair trial. The Magna Carta itself by the way extended that right only to members of the nobility and the Church.
The California Supreme Court case People v Kimball concerned a man named Earl Bud Kimball who was accused of murder. Kimball's lawyer tried to argue that he was not sane at the time of the murder, but the jury found the defendant to be sane and Kimball was convicted of the crime. The California Supreme Court upheld the verdict.
the right to a speedy and public trail the right to trial by an impartial jury the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation the right to have the assistance of counsel for your defense and have the right to confront with the witnesses against him