Want this question answered?
Site other cases that came to similar conclusions
Precedent reflects past cases that have been decided on, usually by the Federal or State Supreme Courts, whose decisions reflect some similarity to the defenses case. Based on the decision made the defense attorney can argue that the same decision applies to his/her case.
If the state or federal government has previously ruled on something, a lawyer can use that established precedent to aid their case and prove their side right.
No. The U.S. Attorney General is head of the Department of Justice and the top law enforcement officer for the United States, but does not typically argue before the Supreme Court, except under special circumstances. The current Attorney General is Eric Holder. The U.S. Solicitor General (and staff attorneys), who is also a member of the Department of Justice, represents the government before the Supreme Court. The Solicitor General, while not a true member of the Court, is sometimes called "the tenth Justice."
Create panic Argue during Robbery Don’t panic or argue during a robbery All Above
That Scott had no right to argue in court
Because the supreme court decides weather or not a new law (a bill at the time) is constitutional or not. they make the final choice
Ruther B. hayes
Borack obama
Borack obama
legalization of bootlegging
Rutherford B. Hayes