Not usually. Civil law exists that an individual who has wrongly incurred damages might be made whole again. It doesn't exist to enrich people who have incurred no damages even if a technical wrong occurred.
No, a tort does not exist because there were no injury's and it must be proven.
Impedance phlebography is painless and safe. It presents no risk to the patient.
No it isn't.
Tortious interference means the wrongful interference with some right or economic opportunity belonging to a person which causes that person some monetary loss. It is usually used in connection with a business opportunity as where a person slanders or libels a person in order to hurt that person's opportunity to make some income in business. The tort of slander or libel will exist on its own to compensate the person for damage to his reputation; but there is the additional tort of wrongful interference with a business opportunity tp compensate the person for loss of income that would have been earned but for the wrongful action of the tortfeasor. Two separate types of damage; two separate torts.
Very probable any action exist.
yes
No
No
The question can be answered in a couple of ways: 1. Third-party coverage is sometimes called liability coverage. It provides benefits for third-party who sustains damage or injury due to the carelessness of the insured. In this context, bodily injury coverage within the liability protection will provide benefits to the injured party for his/her injury. Note, though, that it will pay only upon a finding that the insured was legally responsible for the injury, and that BUT FOR the action or inaction of the insured, the injury would not have occurred. This is the concept of proximate causation. 2. Bodily injury coverage can exist in a first-party policy as well. This is a policy under which the insured is him/herself insured. Examples are the uninsured motorist and personal injury protection coverages of an automobile policy.
Improperly focused, high-intensity ultrasound could burn and physically disrupt delicate eye tissue and cause injury. This risk is, however, slight and would arise only from improper use, or as a potential side effect of tumor or.
There is little to no risk involved in a nasopharyngeal culture.
you can make offered a settelment with them .You acn use worksmancomp for my injury which still exist.