It is possible. Red hair is the most recessive type of hair, followed by blond. It is very possible for two red-headed parents to have a blond haired child. It is even more likely if there are direct relatives that have blond hair, as that gene would usually come out over a red-haired gene. The child may also have red-ish blond hair as they get older, as the gene starts to maifest itself. (This often happens with skin color, folowed by hair color and eye color in children as they age.)
Yes, as red hair is the most recessive colour. If either of the parents had any other coloured genes, they would have that colour hair, not red. (if you are one of the parents - congratulation! I wish I could have red haired children)
It depends on the color of the parents hair. If they both just have the gene but have brown hair lets say then there is a 1 in 4 chance of having a baby with red hair. If one parent has red hair then there is a 50% chance of having a baby with red hair.
No. It can be passed down from grandparents
It depends. If a red head reproduces with a brunette, the brunetter has to be heterozygous genotype for any chance at all of a red headed child.
The two AB parents could have any of an A, B or AB, but not O.The two A parents could have either A or O children, but not B or AB.The two B parents could have either B or O children, but not A or AB.The two O parents could only have O children; they cannot have have A, B or AB.If both parents have rhesus-negative blood, so will their children. If both have positive, the child might be either.
If one parent has blood type B and the other blood type O, it is possible to have a baby of blood type O or B. It is NOT possible (0% chance) to have a baby with blood type A.
There is a high probably that the child would inherit blue eyes. But if the parents are also carries of other eye colour genes. They could inherit a different eye colour if both parents carry the same other colour gene.
no, if both parents are A still there is a chance of O baby ,but for the child to have A blood type atleast one of the parents must have A or AB blood group Parents having the following blod groups may have an A baby AA and AA baby will have A blood group only AA and AO baby with A group only AO and AO baby may have A or O blood group AB and OO baby with A or B blood group AA and OO baby with A blood group only AAand AB baby with A or AB blood group AO and BO baby of A AB B or O blood group AO and AB baby of A AB or B blood group AB and AB baby having A B or AB blood group (each individual has one,two or no antigens .when no antigen it results in O blood group ,when one or two A antigens ,the person has A blood group so its not necessary that both parents of A blood group child have A blood type
O
Actually, the parents do look after the baby dolphins.
No, it is not possible for the baby to have an A group with both parents being O. This is because the parents would have the genotype OO,thus on recombination, the only possible outcome is again an O.
A baby can be born free from AIDS even if both parents have AIDS.
No. There's a small chance the baby will be O negative--if both parents have an Rh negative (recessive) allele, and the baby inherits this allele from both parents, the baby would be Rh negative. But if the baby inherits the Rh positive allele from either parent, the baby will be Rh positive.
If both parents have type A blood then the baby should have type A blood. or type O blood
no why
There are two possible explanations. Not all disorders are genetic; for example, the baby might have an infection, might be malnourished, might be injured. Secondly, the baby actually might have a genetic disorder, because the genetics of a baby are not identical to either of the parents, being inherited from both of them. If both parents have a recessive gene, that gene might not be expressed in either parent but could still be expressed in their baby.
Rh negative is a recessive trait but if both parents had it, then the children would have it.
incase they have a baby, they could she if it's their baby
There is nothing wrong with a baby being in its parents' room. It gives a good bonding time for both parents and the child. It is also an arrangement of security as the parents can listen for anything unusual with the baby.
no, he has at least one - but the other half could be + or - if baby is -- then both parents gave - meaning they both are one of these +- or --
The dna from both the parents are combined together to make a baby therefore the dominant gyne in the dna os what the baby will have