You'd survive just fine. The top of Mt. Everest is more than 20,500 feet above sea level.
The number 10500 in Roman numerals would be (X)D
The sea is at a particular level compared to land. Most land is above sea level (or it would be under the sea or very far inland). If you are a mile above sea level, then you are a mile above where the sea would be if there was no land there.
47.733 945 kiloliters
You would be more above sea level in Spain.
If it was zero it would be flooded, 23 ft above sea level is the answer......
Organisation. Bacteria have cellular level of organisation and humans have organ system level of organisation.
The answer would be sea level because it is not above sea level nor is it under sea level
Sea level is a standard 'height' from which you can measure the relative height of objects (ie. cities) as such, high above sea level would refer to something 1,000+ metres above sea level... or whatever definition you think appropriate.
== == Science Major: Altitude is height above mean sea level (MSL) or true altitude, which means in reference to what sea level is on the ground, or height above ground level (AGL), which is also called absolute altitude, which means height above the ground with no reference to the ground's height above sea level. In example, if the sea level in a certain place is 100 feet and you are 250 feet above the ground, your altitude above sea level would be 350 feet, and your altitude above ground level would be 250 feet.
i think it would be a no because sea level is the lowest level object
Only if the mountain was at sea level would this statement be true. If the mountain was only at sea level would this statement be realistic.
Spain?