Of course not.
The basic rule is as follows: if your landlord files bankruptcy that is a matter between your landlord and his creditors, not you, the tenant. You are still required to pay rent or be evicted, as long as your landlord has control over the property. This applies to whether the landlord has filed for bankruptcy or if the property is under foreclosure. In either case, if you end up staying on the property, the new landlord will provide further instructions on whether to stay or to move.
Probably not.
Usually it means that you can't sue your tenant in regular court, you have to go thru the bankruptcy court. It really shouldn't mean much for you, tho, your tenant will need to keep paying rent, or move out.
They have the same rights as any tenant under the laws of your state. Those include generally a thirty days notice if the owner wants you to move out. They have no interest in the real estate.They have the same rights as any tenant under the laws of your state. Those include generally a thirty days notice if the owner wants you to move out. They have no interest in the real estate.They have the same rights as any tenant under the laws of your state. Those include generally a thirty days notice if the owner wants you to move out. They have no interest in the real estate.They have the same rights as any tenant under the laws of your state. Those include generally a thirty days notice if the owner wants you to move out. They have no interest in the real estate.
it depends if the disabled tenant has another place to live. if they do then yes if not no
“At the end of a term lease can the lanlord require the tenant to move out?”
Not automatically. Oftentimes the new landlord can keep a tenant or opt to ask him to move out.
If they have no lease and there was no previous agreement between the tenant and the owner then I don't see why not. Commonly people give notice to allow the person time to move out and find a new place to live. Perhaps discussing the situation with your tenant and coming to a compromise if they are unable to find immediate accommodations would be a good solution. If not, it is your house and without a lease there is no binding agreement that dictates any warning needed so you should be able to. Answer #2. I don't think the first answer is sound. I'm not a lawyer but this is my understanding of the case. Firstly, the answer depends very much on local laws such as rent control. The fact it is the owner who wants to move in may have no bearing on the case. Secondly, if the tenant has been paying monthly rent and the owner has been accepting it, then the tenant likely has the same rights as a person with a written month-to-month rental agreement. They are owed the same notice of termination which may be 30, 60, 90 days or more depending on local laws and rent control.
Changing apartments is the same as moving from one place to another. There are cleaning and painting that takes place. There is no reason they can't charge the same as if there was a new tenant moving in.
When a tenant doesn't pay his rent the landlord may begin eviction proceedings in court, which forces the tenant to move.
In chapter 5 for The Grapes Of Wrath, the owners of the land suggest the tenant farmers to move to California.
Evict him.