it would have still endangered sooo...... dont bother them
There would be forest because that's where they live.If you go on Google and type in leopard habitat you should find what you want to know.
There would be less animals
it would effect it because there would be too much of what the bald eagles eat and they would eat all of their food and get hungry.and ah... no more mysterious deaths!
The ecosystem would crumble. Every animal provides a valuable role in the ecosystem
A loss of a producer means that there will be less food for consumers since producers are the foundation of an ecosystem
No. It would have no effect, sorry.
A leopard would be much bigger than a snow leopard, and would win.
Some people or animals will die.
Some of the limiting factors that would affect dragonflies would be climate, rain, temperature, and other species in the environment. Species that ate the dragonflies would have the largest effect.
Have you got a leopard? My friend has a leopard. I would like a leopard as a pet! I saw a leopard at the zoo. Leopards have spots. Would you like a leopard? What colour is a leopard? I hope these help you!!
The loss of an important population of animals or plants could create a ripple effect throughout the ecosystem. It may disrupt food chains, alter habitat structure, and lead to imbalances in population dynamics. This could ultimately impact biodiversity, ecosystem stability, and the services provided by the ecosystem.
The snow leopard eats things such as marmot, wild sheeps and goats. These types of food keep the snow leopards ecosystem in balance if the leopards would eat different foods the ecosystem would be out of balance and they would overeat the vegetation and decrease the surroundings environment for all that live near