they would all be monkeys.
then the world would be the same
duu all the living things in the world u dum dum
biomass is a good measurement. this would measure all living things in a certain unit area plant and animal, but don't forget the flying things and the creepy crawlys underground
An animal cell is very important. Without cells, there would be no animals. Cells are what make up animals and all other living things.
How about this: global annihiation of all living things.
the animal cells would eventually erode away as the pile got stronger and this would eventually kill living things if we end up without any cells
Because how would you be treated that way , thought so. Also animals are good to the enviorment . THEY ARE LIVING THINGS
If there was no energy in the world, nothing ould exist eg. all living things and animals would not be alive. The world wouldn't exist and nor would the Universe. The world would perish.
Yes, all living things depend on non-living things. For example: - A plant requires sunlight, soil and water, all non-living things. - An animal requires a habitat, so rocks, dirt, etc. which are non-living things. Even if the animal did not depend on these things, it would still need to eat other animals or plants and plants need non-living things to survive.
If you knew, you would think "what kind of world are we living in?" Trust me, you don't want to know.
A lot of characteristics that it has makes it an animal. For example it is a living organism, I responds to changes, reproduces etc. If you had asked me what makes a pig a mammals, I would certainly have more things to tell you. ;)
These organisms reduce dead plants and animals to their component compounds. Without them, the world would soon be buried in the remains of formerly living things.