All tanks are armored; if they weren't armored they would be called self propelled guns (because they have a cannon mounted on them). It they were armored, but didn't have a gun (cannon) it would be called an armored personnel carrier. Therefore, since it's got armor & a gun, it's called a tank.
The Army still uses armored cars and light tanks similar to tank destroyers, but not the same kind of tank destroyers as they did in WWII.
the ones that can kill u if u get shot with them
The NVA had 3 Armored Regiments, and used T54/T55/T59 medium tanks (100mm gun) supplied by the USSR & Red China. The T59 was a CHICOM version of the T54/55. PT76 amphibious light tanks were also supplied to the NVA by the USSR/Red China; these had 76mm guns.
Pistols,rifles,bayonets,light and heavy machine guns,tanks,armored cars, and airplanes.
Austria and Turkey did not use tanks. Germany built only twenty tanks, and they used captured British tanks which were in no short supply.
they used weapons like m16 and rbg7 and the also used Mercedes and Ferrari tanks and water guns
During the Vietnam War: 1. US forces used M48A3 Patton medium gun tanks and M551 Sheridan light tanks (Armored Airborne Reconnaissance Assault Vehicles). 2. ARVN forces (South Viet Army) used US supplied M41 Walker Bulldog light tanks. 3. Australian forces used Centurion medium gun tanks. 4. NVA (North Viet Army) used Soviet/Chicom supplied T54 or T55 medium gun tanks and PT76 Amphibious light tanks. During the early stages of the war, there were some old left over WWII Japanese Type 95 light tanks being used by the French supported forces.
The truck was based off of a Ford super duty
First impressive use of the Australian 1st Armored Regiments Centurion tanks in battle.
WW1: Tanks had one main purpose; to spearhead attacks on the enemy line so that friendly forces could pour through the breach. No proper anti-tank weapons existed in WW1, so they were almost invulnerable to enemy fire as they crossed trenches and wiped out enemy defenses. Unfortunately, the mobility of WW1 tanks was somewhat poor. They were slow, short on range, and constantly breaking down. WW2: Tanks were used for the above-mentioned purpose but also in other ways. There were airborne tanks for paratroopers, amphibious tanks for marines, light tanks for various light armored duties, heavy tanks for assault, etc. In the early years of the war some countries tried to use light tanks as a substitute for cavalry, and in this role they failed miserably, as the enemy could hear them coming and be waiting to butcher them with anti-tank weapons. Armored cars proved much better for this purpose.
Tanks were able to move farther and faster than soldiers walking. Also, tank had weapons capabilities two machine guns, along with a .75mm gun,which was used for accuracy and long range. Tanks also had a psychological effect on personal because tanks were armored plated,small arms fire did little effect on them., tanks also had a choice of shells to use on targets, disciplinary high explosive, smoke,etc... Tanks were just a part of the military organization to provide support to the infantry.
there were many tanks in WW2, mostly medium tanks, but during ww2 heavy tanks were also popularized, we dont use those today mainly main battle tanks[mbt's] the main tank of the Soviet Union was the 76.2mm t-34 medium tank, for the U.s. the m4 sherman, and for the germans the Panzerkampfwagen IV, Panzerkampfwagen V panther, Panzerkampfwagen VI ausfhrung e & b [Tiger I & Tiger II] and tanks are armored fighting vehicles with main cannons and turrets, and the general rule is no small arms fire can penetrate it[ which by so far every tank has followed, although some go as low as they can right on the line.]